The press has picked up on the collapse yesterday of
the trial on drugs charges of singer Tulisa Contostavlos, after Judge
Alistair McCreath concluded that Sun on
Sunday’s “ace reporter” Mazher
Mahmood had lied to him, with the sole purpose of manipulating evidence. Or
rather, most of the press has picked up on the story: no prizes for guessing
which title kept schtum.
Tulisa Contostavlos
Yes, while
the Mail thundered “The 'lying'
Fake Sheikh who tricked Tulisa and new shame for The Sun as former X-Factor
judge is CLEARED of arranging cocaine deal with undercover reporter”, and the Mirror went
for the more prosaic “Tulisa trial
collapses: Dramatic scenes at Southwark Crown Court as case THROWN OUT”,
the Murdoch Sun remained tight-lipped
and ashen-faced.
While the
Evening Standard noted that “Tulisa Contostavlos weeps as judge throws
drugs case out of court ... ‘Fake Sheikh’ tainted integrity of the
court, says Tulisa judge”, and
the Guardian told that “Tulisa Contostavlos trial collapses over
Mazher Mahmood's evidence ... Judge says case cannot go on because of
belief that 'fake sheikh' had lied at pre-trial hearing”, Rupe’s downmarket troops said nothing.
That was then ...
Even the Times only managed a footnote on the
front page, which one might have easily missed, were one not looking out for
it. How different it all was when Mahmood stung Ms Contostavlos: under the
proclamation “World Exclusive”, the Sunday
Sun headline screamed “Tulisa’s Cocaine Deal Shame ... X Factor
star caught setting up secret sale with drugs pal”.
The paper’s daily
stablemate was not backward in coming forward for a piece of the action,
announcing beneath the claim of a “Drug
Shame Exclusive” the news “We Will
Arrest Tulisa Say Cops ... Star to be quizzed over cocaine deal”. So anyone
trying to spin the angle “the daily
wouldn’t comment because they’re two separate papers” is advised to take
that lame deflection and shove it.
... but this is now
What about today’s
Super Soaraway Currant Bun? You jest: while everyone else is reporting the
shame of Britain’s allegedly favourite paper, the Murdoch faithful ask readers
to “look over there” at Young Dave
being jolly tough with Vladimir Putin, the only trace of sleb presence being
Katie Price. That means they’re desperate. Not even a mention of their having
suspended Mahmood.
The Guardian noted
that “Often posing as a rich
Arabic businessman or royal, he claims to have conducted stories which saw 100
people jailed, including paedophiles and arms dealers. He has also duped
celebrities such as the Countess of Wessex and Sven-Göran Eriksson into
revealing secrets”. Perhaps Mazher Mahmood might like to try a first-hand
investigation of the criminal justice system next?
And perhaps the Murdoch faithful can come clean about their
stables. Which aren’t.
1 comment:
According to Roy Greenslade in today's Guardian the story did get coverage in The Sun. From the picture he shows it appears to be on page 20 and covers almost half a page.
Not as close to the front as you might expect - but coverage nonetheless.
Post a Comment