There can be no sadder sight in journalism than those who
have been deliberately spinning and talking up politicians who do not otherwise
merit their position keeping up the pretence, even after that politician has
been removed from office. Thus it has been with the thoroughly
deserved demotion last week of Michael “Oiky”
Gove, and the desperate wailing of pundits in its wake.
Yes, "Oiky", you're sacked. Off you go
This refusal to confront reality – that Gove’s flagship Free
Schools policy had gone over a billion notes over budget, that some of them had
been forcibly closed down, with others courting a variety of controversy over
location, probity, organisation and standards, together with his alienation of
the teaching profession and many parents - is most noticeable within the
Northcliffe House bunker.
Yes, at the Daily Mail,
Gove is still not unadjacent to some kind of earthbound deity. Pundits are
rallying round to his wife Sarah “Vain”
Vine, who has taken “Oiky’s”
defenestration particularly badly – only yesterday she was happily Retweeting
another supportive article on the subject – with one message, that Young Dave
was wrong. Typical
of the supporters is Amanda Bloody Platell.
Awww bless!
“My fellow columnist
Sarah Vine’s tweet after her husband Michael Gove was demoted from Education
Secretary to Chief Whip bears repeating. ‘Biggest losers in today’s reshuffle?’
she asked. ‘Bright kids at low-achieving state schools.’ Indeed. For the PM to put
his own future before that of children is despicable; to boot out one of our
greatest education reformers is unforgivable” she whined.
And, as Jon Stewart might have said, two things here. One,
as noted, Ms Platell takes the spin that Gove is some kind of “great reformer”, which he was not. And
two, the author of that Tweet was not Ms Vine, but LBC host Julia
Hartley-Brewer. Thus the lousy quality of Daily
Mail journalism summed up in one. But support is at hand from Simon “Enoch was right” Heffer.
Award-winning journalistic accuracy in action
The
Hefferlump tells that “the greatest
damage has not been done to Mr Gove — who will surely rise again — but to
generations of children who will now not benefit from his radicalism as
Education Secretary ... What is so depressing is how Mr Gove’s demotion
perfectly symbolises the short-termism that characterises David Cameron’s whole
approach to politics”.
He goes on (unfortunately) “For the Prime Minister ... nothing matters but the re-election of one
David Cameron”. Rather than handing Labour a majority so that the Mail’s clueless pundits can moan even
more loudly, you mean? Gove pissed all over his colleagues, he wouldn’t keep
his SpAds in line, he presided over the spraying of taxpayer funds up the wall,
and the public hated the sight of him.
Amanda Platell and Simon Heffer think that’s A Very Good
Thing. Er, hello?
1 comment:
"Gove pissed all over his colleagues, he wouldn’t keep his SpAds in line, he presided over the spraying of taxpayer funds up the wall, and the public hated the sight of him."
Ah! I wondered why he got locked in the loo.
Rather a shame he survived that banana skin outside No 10 still so graphically described on Youtube.
Given that former colleagues praise his command of the bigger picture with a disdain of the small detail his present "promotion" (as he would put it) will be interesting to say the least. Another Cameron gamble too far?
Post a Comment