While there was the usual snarking from those in her own
party – many of whom chose to remain anonymous, proving yet again that no man
is of perfect courage – Sayeeda Warsi has garnered some support for her stance
on the behaviour of Israeli forces in Gaza, not least from
former chief whip Andrew Mitchell, who has “demanded an arms embargo in response to the ‘misery and carnage’ in
Gaza”.
Not even approaching fair and balanced
Elsewhere, claims of growing anti-Semitism as justification
for standing by the actions of the IDF have been put into more accurate
context, notably by Mira Bar-Hillel in her latest
Independent Voices piece, which
notes that those questioning the actions of their own countrymen in Israel are
more likely to need protection. But none of this has deterred Melanie “not just Barking but halfway to Upminster”
Phillips.
Mel says they’re all wrong, in her own inimitable manner. “Warsi’s dubious track record on Hamas and
Islamic radicalisation. One might wonder she was ever in UK Government” she
observed, citing Islamophobic bigot Doug Murray the K. And as for Labour: “Ed Mili et al supporting Warsi thus
endorsing condemnation of Cameron for refusing to call on Israel to surrender
to genocidal Hamas. Vile”.
The Lib Dem position? “Israel
fighting genocidal Islamofascism in proportionate war; Clegg would punish it by
stopping arms sales. He is totally unfit for office” And she’s worried
about Young Dave: “Will Cameron buckle
under this tide of venomous malice and lies not consuming UK over Israel? Will
he abandon truth and decency?” Ah, the truth and decency that killed
hundreds of children, eh? But do go on.
Oh, don’t worry, she’ll do that: “UK political hysteria over Israel shows Hamas manipulation / lies and
media cynicism / incitement have worked. UK now sliding into moral cesspit”.
And Warsi’s contribution? “Warsi doesn’t
slam Hamas for stated aim to destroy Israel and kill all Jews in pursuit of
jihad, nor Hamas was crimes, only Israel defence”. Hamas acknowledged Israel’s
right to exist earlier this year, Mel.
But she’s not for listening: “Hypocrisy of UK pols slamming Israel for ‘disproportionate’ war in Gaza
when UK showed hugely less care to protect civilians in Afghanistan [and]
Kosovo”. No thanks, I don’t want to look over there. Anyway, back to Warsi:
“Warsi suggests Israel in Gaza not
consistent with rule of law. Rubbish. Israel attacks permitted by int’l law
because targeted with warnings”.
Well, that’s all right, then. And look over there at Warsi’s
threats! “Warsi statement repeats
Islamist threats worldwide: back our line of you will get more domestic Muslim
terrorism. Will Cam fold before this?” She didn’t threaten anything. Final
rant? “Israel commits no atrocities; it
is the victim of them. Is there a point where you will support its defence
against them?” Ah, if only it was defence. But it isn’t.
Reality and Mad Mel never were close friends. Now they’ve fallen out for good.
1 comment:
From what I can tell, Israeli attacks are not in fact necessarily legal if 'targetted with warnings' - certainly not if the 'warning's are things like 'roof knocks' which are easy to confuse with actual bombings, and certainly not if, as Israel seems to have done, they also send bogus warning calls to people in addition to the real ones.
Post a Comment