Picture the scene: a woman contacts a masseuse to visit her
house to give her partner a massage as a birthday present. The visit ends in
some kind of disagreement, but the masseuse is paid and the woman who contacted
her apologises for any misunderstanding. However you slice this story, there is
nothing of any news value, or indeed any
value.
Russell Brand at Those Awards
Ah, but when you tell that the woman was Jemima Khan, her partner Russell Brand, and that the masseuse, Szilvia Berki, later went to the Police and made a complaint of assault, then the Fourth Estate is suddenly entitled to wheel out the full range of prurience, prejudice and judgmental nudge-nudgery for which, to no surprise at all, they have no evidence – as usual.
What may have happened, and what is driving Ms Berki to act
as she has, is not important, and so this blog will not be going there. The
reasons for examining this case are one, the gratuitous sneering at Brand, and
two, the pack mentality of the press, the latter exemplified
by the Mail: “The original story has been widely reported
in the Daily Telegraph and re-published on media websites”
Yeah, see, everyone else is doing it, and our website has to
be the go-to place for clickbait, so we’re doing it too! This particularly lame
excuse was also
deployed by the Mirror (the Sunday People ran the print copy), the
Independent (not that anyone at
the Lebedev press is desperate, you understand), and
the Telegraph, showing that Private Eye was right to call it The Daily Hellograph.
So why flog this not-really-a-story half to death? Ah well.
The Daily Beast gives
us one great big clue: Russell Brand has “previously called for a socialist revolution
and the overthrow of the Capitalist system”
and Ms Khan’s house in Oxfordshire is allegedly worth £15 million, a sum which
is faithfully repeated in every report. This must mean that they’re just
hypocrites.
Then we’re told that she is a “socialite”, which means she doesn’t have
to go out to work, so readers have to get jealous. On top of all that, Brand
was, along with Jonathan Ross, involved in Sachsgate, which not only confirms
that he is a bad lad and therefore a legitimate target, but also that the press
– the Mail in this case – helped
bring him down. So the press is still powerful, readers.
Add in that Hugh Grant once dated
Ms Khan, and his being a bogeyman for much of the Fourth Estate brings an
imperative to the story. How he hasn’t been mentioned thus far is a mystery:
perhaps his name is being saved for any later developments. But what this
affair is not about is that a couple had a dispute with a masseuse. It’s an
excuse for sleb knocking copy, with Ms Berki the unfortunate collateral damage.
And it’s cheap to churn out this faux outrage. So it will keep being churned out.
No comments:
Post a Comment