The perpetually thirsty Paul Staines and his rabble at the
Guido Fawkes blog never admits to making wrong calls, and certainly not to any
failure to achieve their objectives, but as I told
recently, their attack on Commons Speaker John Bercow over the granting of
a pass to wife Sally’s friend Farah Sassoon has run out of road. The last press
mention was
in the Telegraph eight days ago.
Fart in lift inquiry resumes. Badly
So does The Great Guido accept defeat gracefully? You jest. All that happened was that the
Speaker’s expenses were once again pored over in the vain hope of digging up
some more dirt in order to curry favour with those who scrabble around the
dunghill that is Grubstreet – to whom the Fawkes folks have so shamelessly sold
out. So today they have had another go at Bercow, over
a trip to Manchester.
Sadly, this poorly researched snark will go as far as the
pass story, which is nowhere. Much is made of the Speaker’s car – or cab –
travel, from Westminster to London’s Euston station, and around Manchester. The
Fawkes rabble claims that it can all be done so much cheaper using Uber, which
they paint as a free market solution, rather than a massive corporate trying to
crush self-employed cabbies.
Unfortunately for The Great Guido, without knowing what
route was taken, and who may have been collected and dropped off along the way,
it is not possible to make a meaningful comparison. And, as I’ve noted
previously, the basic Uber car is way
short on spec compared with a black cab. So that’s a Not Proven, then. And
the Manchester car charge allegations are equally unproven.
Staines and his pals say that Bercow claimed £500, but could
have done this for £50. However, and here we encounter a significantly sized
however, the event he had gone to Manchester to attend – Paul Goggins’
funeral – was not in Manchester, but at Salford Cathedral. Goggins was MP
for Wythenshawe and Sale East, and there may have been a constituency gathering
afterwards.
Wythenshawe is well out of town. Taxi costs will therefore
increase accordingly. But the Fawkes rabble finally scores a minor hit with
Bercow’s hotel claim, of £364 for three people for one night. This is above the
MP’s accommodation limit of £120 per room per night. Wow. A
whole £4. And rooms at the Ibis Budget quoted by the Fawkes blog will each
cost rather more than the £32 quoted – without
breakfast.
Then we come to the
train fares, which the Fawkes folks skip over. That may be because the
amount of £79.70 per person return is not “the
standard fare” but the Standard Off-Peak fare. MPs can legitimately
claim full Standard fare, which for London to Manchester is a honking
£321 return, or £963 for three. But Bercow’s party paid only £239.10 – a saving
of £723.90.
So that’s another glorious Fawkes failure. Another fine mess, once again.
2 comments:
Wot about Tory champagne bill ?
Re. the Ibis £32 rooms - that's their summer special offer rate, the funeral was back in January! Which raises another question, was Uber around in January?
Post a Comment