Just
three days ago, I noted that “Uber gets
into price wars; it therefore lowers prices. Driver earnings take the hit”.
This was clearly anathema to all those Clever People Who Talk Loudly In
Restaurants out there on the right, notably ConHome’s Mark Wallace, who had adamantly
told that ““[Uber] Drivers work for
themselves under better conditions with a better income”.
It does not require a qualification in rocket science to
deduce that Wallace and I cannot both be right. So who called this one
correctly? Ah well. Sadly for ConHome’s credibility, it was not Wallace: almost
as soon as I had posted those earlier observations, Uber’s London operation decided to cut the price on its UberX
offering, which means basic cars like the Toyota Prius and VW Passat.
“London commuters face
fare decrease. Starting tomorrow!” told the Uber London Twitter feed. The
perpetually thirsty Paul Staines was in no doubt as to what this meant: “Free markets work. [Uber] just cut taxi fares by 15%. 2 sharing is
cheaper than Tube! Get £10 off first ride!” Uber ain’t a taxi, and the
aspect of that free market in action here was seemingly lost on Staines.
One critic knew exactly
what was happening: “The race to the
bottom”. What that 15% cut means is that, at existing fare levels, there
was insufficient demand to meet supply, and so the price is being reduced in
order to (theoretically) clear the market. All those right-wing think tanks
would no doubt approve. But the 15% reduction was also a unilateral imposition
of a similarly-sized pay cut on drivers.
Matt The List was unaware of this: “[Uber] was so cheap in [the] USA. So hooray ... 15%
cheaper in London from Friday!” Car purchase or leasing, insurance,
congestion charge, fuel and maintenance, and living costs for drivers remain
constant. Yet their earnings are cut at a stroke by 15%. Hooray indeed.
Yes, as Knowledge Boy pointed out, that 15% decrease in
fares meant “Uber X drivers face 15% pay
cut”. Invariably self-employed, and with no union or trade association to
fight for them, Uber’s London drivers are screwed. It is exactly as happened in
the USA. In the new sharing economy, those with all the money still wield all
the clout: nothing changes.
Yet the likes of Jamie Rigg just don’t get it: “I doubt London’s black cabbies are thrilled
about Uber cutting prices in the capital by 15%”. If the two bods in that
photo are Uber drivers, they might not be smiling quite so broadly now.
Meanwhile, black cab drivers can sit back, smile and respond “I told you so”.
Uber CEO Travis Kalanick thinks his main competitor is an “asshole”, and cares little about his own
drivers. But
he is a billionaire. And how d’you think he gained that worth? Have a think about it.
4 comments:
Now all those 'Clever People in Restaurants' who are paid far too much can complain about the increase in tax credit payments.
They aren't clever enough to see that the burden of any cut falls at their door.
*cough* pyramidscheme *cough*
Unless their career in music has gone down the pan, and I don't think it has, they are certainly not taxi drivers. They are 2 young gentlemen who go by the name of Rizzle Kicks.
Their music is available from all good music retailers.
Terrible for drivers
Post a Comment