The latest development in the story in which Cliff Richard
is still innocent – despite the wall to wall nudge-nudgery – has shown us two
of the right-leaning press’ favourite habits at work. One of these is the rush
to follow the latest twist, the sheep instinct, and the other is, if in doubt,
blame the BBC for anything and everything. And once again, the nastiest of the
boot boys is the Mail.
Now that the singer’s apartment has been raided, and there
is no further real news, the blame game has begun. At first, the Sundays were
going to kick South Yorkshire Police, a most convenient target, given the force
is already getting it in the neck as the Hillsborough Inquiry gets into its
stride. “Police chief under fire over Sir
Cliff” was the front page headline in the Sunday Times.
The
Telegraph concurred: “Sir Cliff: now law chief attacks Police over
televised raid” it told, also prominently displayed on the front page. But
all was swept away as
the Mail On Sunday thundered “Cliff Raid: BBC In Crisis ... Police fury at
TV chiefs who screened dramatic swoop”. No fury, you understand, attaches
to the papers that nudged and winked their way through the story the following
day.
No, the MoS is
certain what this means: “The BBC was
plunged into a new crisis last night after it was publicly blasted by police
over its role in the shock Sir Cliff Richard sex abuse investigation”.
Yeah, right. There is even a suitably gullible Tory MP, Andrew Bridgen, to
accuse the Corporation of “blackmail”
on the basis of not knowing what the heck he was talking about.
What the MoS does
not seem to have taken on board is this: the suggestion from “Police sources” is that a BBC journalist
contacted them some weeks ago, claiming to know about their investigation into
the allegation against Cliff Richard. Therefore, it is claimed, the Police were
not the source for the Beeb knowing about the story, which culminated in last
week’s raid.
However, and here we encounter a significantly sized
however, nobody seems to be asking the obvious question: how did that BBC journalist
find out that there was a Police investigation? Someone must have told them,
and that someone is most likely to have been a Police officer. So the complaint
made by the South Yorkshire force to the Beeb has one main purpose: find the mole.
Everything else is conjecture, to which observers of the
press will shrug their shoulders and observe “no change there, then”. The sheep instinct, in the meantime, has
taken hold, exemplified by the Telegraph
changing
direction and obediently following along behind the MoS. In the meantime, there has still been no request for Cliff
Richard to return to the UK and talk to the Police.
Yes, he is still innocent, not that the right-wing press
care. No change there, indeed.
2 comments:
It could also be that someone the police spoke with in the process of the enquiry told someone who told the BBC.
Had enough folk complained about the disgraceful treatment meted out to the dead man, we wouldn't be putting up with this nonsense now. Justice For Jimmy Savile, that's the name of my blog and there's more of us than you might think.
Stop this madness now and put those who engineered it on trial !
Great piece by the way, cheers !
Post a Comment