While the Daily Mail
continues
to blame the Environment Agency (EA) for the flooding on the Somerset
Levels and in the Thames Valley, the deeply subversive Guardian has discovered not only that proposed flood defences for
some of the affected areas have been the subject of spending cuts, but also
that farming methods – approved by the Government – have made matters worse.
Flooding on the Somerset Levels
The Mail has
continued to exploit the understandable upset of those affected by the floods,
telling “The rivers were once managed by
the National Rivers Authority who regularly cleared silt and debris from the
waterways, until responsibility passed to the Environment Agency”, this
being backed up by three photos of one location on the River Parrett at
Burrowbridge.
This is then juxtaposed with a shot of widespread flooding
on the Levels, the clear suggestion being that, if only the river banks at that
location had been as they were many years ago, it would never have happened.
But here a problem enters: the idea that all the floodwater could have been
carried away under that bridge without the Parrett bursting its banks is
ludicrous.
Moreover, the EA does
clear blockages such as leaves and trees, shrubs, and other rubbish from rivers
and drainage channels (see presentation HERE).
And the agency is clearly prepared to talk about dredging, although, as it
points out, siltation occurs in what it calls “slow flow areas”: in flood, the river’s mechanical action takes
away silt and other debris. And
then there are those cuts.
“A £2.2m scheme to
improve flood management on the Parrett, the main river draining the Levels,
and the nearby Sowy river, was postponed and currently has no prospect of
funding before 2020 ... Another scheme for the Parrett, near the village of
Burrowbridge, was in line for £300,000 of funding from 2011-13 but has received
nothing”. Burrowbridge? See above. And there is another cancelled scheme.
“A third scheme for
the river, called ‘Parrett Estuary – Cannington Bends’, worth £6.2m, covered an
area near where it meets the sea [which] would have moved 536 homes out of ‘the very significant or significant
flood probability category to the moderate or low category’”. Then there
is the farming problem, revealed by the tireless George Monbiot today.
The previous Government made subsidies for maize production
conditional: “Ground cover crops should
be sown under the maize and the land should be ploughed, then resown with
winter cover plants within 10 days of harvesting, to prevent water from sheeting
off”. The Coalition removed the condition after lobbying by farmers. That’s
just one way that those protesting loudest have contributed to their own mess.
It’s understandable that folks urge simple remedies. But the story isn’t so simple.
No comments:
Post a Comment