It still seems like yesterday, but ten years have passed
since David Kelly, the weapons inspector caught up in the bruising row between
the Blair Government and the BBC, was found dead near
his Oxfordshire home. Kelly got thrown under the bus, the Beeb lost a very
able Director-General, and even Tone emerged seriously damaged and minus his
chief spinmeister.
David Kelly giving evidence to the Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee
To commemorate the anniversary, there has been the usual
renewal of calls for a release of any information about Kelly’s death not
already in the public domain, assertions that there must be an inquest into the
death – as if that will miraculously reveal new information – and the
continuing allegations that he would still be alive if not for the machinations
of Tone and Big Al.
But one participant gets off scot free, and their identity
will be revealed later in this post. Meanwhile, the deeply subversive Guardian has stuck to a more orthodox
line, with Vikram Dodd telling “Death
of WMD dossier scientist contributed to erosion of trust in politics” with
which there can be little argument. That erosion only continued when the
mythical Iraqi WMD could not be persuaded to materialise.
Such an approach will not, of course, suffice for the
legendarily foul mouthed Paul Dacre, who has commanded Stephen “Miserable Git” Glover over the top in a
tenth birthday why-oh-why fest. “Ten
years ago today, Dr Kelly's body was found. The subsequent cover-up is one of
the great scandals of our age ... we still do not know for certain why or how
Dr Kelly died”. Bullshit.
And so is the rest of the article, with “facts” presented with more side than a
Ronnie O’Sullivan trick shot, then massaged and selected to fit the agenda: Tone
and Big Al fixed it all with their pal Charlie Falconer, Hutton did not
conclude as the Mail would wish and
was therefore compliant, and we haven’t been given what Dacre and his hacks
laughably call “The Truth”. Pull the other one.
As Tom Mangold has
noted in a piece for Independent Voices,
“Sadly, conspiracy theories grow like
choking green algae in oxygen-starved waters. If only the conspiracy nuts were
right – then poor investigative journalists like me would be rolling in dosh
instead of eking out our humble lives on subsistence fees”. And all those
targeting Alastair Campbell are missing out someone.
Look who's here, everyone!
Step forward Andrew “Transcription
Error” Gilligan, whose journalistic
craft came up short under Hutton’s examination. It
was Gilligan who told members of the Commons committee that questioned
Kelly that he was also the source used by Newsnight’s
Susan Watts. That undoubtedly increased the pressure on Kelly when he appeared
before them. Yet he manages to get away without attracting any flak.
Gilligan should no
longer be the forgotten man of the David Kelly affair.
2 comments:
What an absurd article that does not engage with a single argument of the so-called conspiracy theorists. If you bothered to you would know that leading figures in the campaign for an inquest do not make any reference to 'theory' or 'conspiracy'. They are simply concerned to have a full and open appraisal of all the facts which can only take place once all the evidence is made public (as opposed to three quarters of police records being suppressed under the highest levels of secrecy) and witnesses are questioned under oath and cross-examination in a coroner's court - something routinely granted in any individual unnatural death. Anyone who thinks Hutton's verdict of death by severed ulnar artery is safe, including Tom Mangold, either hasn't looked at the facts of this case or has done so with extremely tinted glasses.
Allowing comments does not mean I agree with them, and especially this one.
Post a Comment