The supposed impartiality of the perpetually thirsty Paul
Staines and his rabble at the Guido Fawkes blog was called into question yet
again this week as they not only trotted out misinformation from the cheaper
end of the Fourth Estate, but did so to bash those rotten lefties, and to
burnish their credentials as unswerving supporters of the memory of Margaret Thatcher.
“Maggie
Funeral Final Cost: £1,205,809” declared the Fawkes blog yesterday,
adding that this was some kind of national bargain as it worked out at a mere
1.9 pence per person. Then it was time to kick the rotten leftie Mirror and deeply subversive Guardian for having the gall to suggest
that the real cost of Mrs T’s send-off could be as high as £10 million.
Yeah, that’ll show them, eh? But this was neither original,
and nor was it factually accurate, both these being trademarks of the Fawkes
rabble. The post was culled from the Super Soaraway Currant Bun, to which
Staines and his pals have sold out, in order to ingratiate themselves with
Rupe, so they can get a column on the Sunday edition. At least the original
headline had been toned down.
“£1m
Lady T funeral bill shames lefties” proclaimed the original article by the Sun’s non-bullying political editor Tom
Newton Dunn. “LADY Thatcher’s funeral
cost just £1,205,809 — a TENTH of the amount claimed by Lefties” he
asserted, knowing that Sun readers
need some WORDS in CAPITALS so they know when to get REALLY ANGRY about
SOMETHING.
Sadly, Newton Dunn’s “exclusive”
– and The Great Guido’s lifting of it – were being a little economical with the
actualité, as the
Guardian has now pointed out. The
costs of policing and security, and of the funeral, were as shown by the Sun. But Newton Dunn had managed to miss
out the minor detail of the £2 million “opportunity
cost” of policing – that of 4,000 officers not available for duties
elsewhere.
Moreover, the
opportunity cost for the 700 military personnel was not included, and for that
you can easily add another half a million or so. And then there is the hundreds
of thousands, maybe millions, in production lost to the economy through all
those people having the day off. Or would the papers who said there were so
many lining the route now
like to scale down their numbers?
So there is, in
reality, nothing for any “lefties”,
or indeed anyone who favours full disclosure of information, to be ashamed
about here: the total Thatcher funeral bill may well have exceeded the £10 million estimate given by the Mirror and Guardian at
the outset. Not that Newton Dunn will be saying anything beyond his original
propaganda piece, and nor will The Great Guido.
Derivative, dishonest,
grovelling, and yet obedient – another fine
mess, once again.
1 comment:
If all the spectators had been on strike the right would have said the "cost to the economy" was unacceptable and the law needed changing.
Personally I was happy to chip to pay for Thatchers funeral - I just wish it had been done 30 years ago!
Post a Comment