[Update at end of post]
Young Dave does seem to have a problem with selecting his close advisors: first, despite all the warnings he was given, including from the editor of the deeply subversive Guardian, he gave Andy Coulson a berth as chief spinmeister, and now he has retained the services of the singularly unpleasant Lynton Crosby, just to advise the party, you understand.
Young Dave does seem to have a problem with selecting his close advisors: first, despite all the warnings he was given, including from the editor of the deeply subversive Guardian, he gave Andy Coulson a berth as chief spinmeister, and now he has retained the services of the singularly unpleasant Lynton Crosby, just to advise the party, you understand.
Yes you, ya bladdy drongo
Lynt also
works for Philip Morris, the company that owns the Marlboro brand, and by
sheer coincidence, plans for cigarettes to be sold only in plain packets were
left out of the last Queen’s Speech, and have now – at least for this
parliament – been abandoned. In 2009, over 100,000 died from smoking related
diseases. Plain packaging contributes to smokers kicking the habit.
Yet Cameron has no problem with having Crosby advise both
him and Big Tobacco, although he once again failed to answer a direct question
from Andrew Marr yesterday on whether or not his advisor has had a conversation
with him about the plain packaging issue. And Marr didn’t ask him about Crosby’s
connection to the shale gas industry, the
one that just scored favourable tax breaks.
As if this were not enough to set alarm bells ringing, now
has come the news that Crosby’s firm has been giving assistance to the
H5 Private Healthcare Alliance on exploiting
perceived “failings” within the NHS.
If that were not a sufficiently serious conflict of interest, Crosby’s
fingerprints, as I pointed
out the other day, were all over the crude and vicious briefings around the
Keogh Review report.
So Crosby sets in train the stories that were carried in the
Telegraph, Mail and Sun on July 14,
pushing the “13,000 deaths” figure,
describing NHS hospitals as “death traps”,
and talking of “squalor”, knowing
that not only did none of that feature in Keogh’s report, but also that if he
frightened enough of the public, it would mean more business for his private
sector clients.
Then Keogh’s report was published, and demonstrated that the
briefing had been a pack of lies. What to do? Brief the same story over again,
that’s what. What has clearly been a political operation to spin Keogh’s
findings has
apparently left him furious at the Tories and resulted in him personally
apologising to Andy Burnham, the target selected by Downing Street for the most
vicious abuse.
But the H5 Private Healthcare Alliance will be more than
happy, as they and other like-minded organisations seek to reverse the recent
decline in the percentage of the population going private (from 12.8% to
just 10.8% over the past decade). Meanwhile, the questions will continue to be
asked about what influence Crosby wields, and the potential for corruption of
Government.
And just imagine the
furore if he’d been advising a Labour Government.
[UPDATE 1610 hours: the counter spin has already started, with the perpetually thirsty Paul Staines and his rabble at the Guido Fawkes blog pretending that the private healthcare presentation featured by the Guardian earlier was no big deal, because someone who supports Labour was there (the Guardian did not say otherwise). The Fawkes folks also have the whole of the presentation, which begs the question as to who passed it to them (we don't get to hear that, of course).
The Guardian is accused of being selective in its presentation, and The Great Guido illustrates this with a slide asserted not to feature anywhere in the Guardian article.
Sadly, someone at the Fawkes blog has not read the article they are slagging off: the very first point on the slide, "The British people are proud of the NHS, but also supportive of a role for private hospitals in Britain's overall healthcare system" is reproduced word for word in paragraph 10 of the currently available Guardian piece.
So when The Great Guido talks of "a lengthy Corrections and Clarifications coming tomorrow", you know that, as usual, it won't be the Fawkes rabble doing them. They don't say sorry, just amend and cut in the hope that no-one notices. Another fine mess]
[UPDATE 1610 hours: the counter spin has already started, with the perpetually thirsty Paul Staines and his rabble at the Guido Fawkes blog pretending that the private healthcare presentation featured by the Guardian earlier was no big deal, because someone who supports Labour was there (the Guardian did not say otherwise). The Fawkes folks also have the whole of the presentation, which begs the question as to who passed it to them (we don't get to hear that, of course).
The Guardian is accused of being selective in its presentation, and The Great Guido illustrates this with a slide asserted not to feature anywhere in the Guardian article.
Sadly, someone at the Fawkes blog has not read the article they are slagging off: the very first point on the slide, "The British people are proud of the NHS, but also supportive of a role for private hospitals in Britain's overall healthcare system" is reproduced word for word in paragraph 10 of the currently available Guardian piece.
So when The Great Guido talks of "a lengthy Corrections and Clarifications coming tomorrow", you know that, as usual, it won't be the Fawkes rabble doing them. They don't say sorry, just amend and cut in the hope that no-one notices. Another fine mess]
No comments:
Post a Comment