The Staggers’
Media Mole noted
yesterday that James “saviour of
Western civilisation” Delingpole, recently appointed to the batshit
collective that is Breitbart London, had changed his tune on the latest in the Grand Theft Auto series in his column
for the Spectator magazine. What was
merely touched upon, though, was the real reason for Del Boy’s apparently
Damascene conversion.
"Gay marriage" ... "Global warming" ... "Eco crucifixes" ... "Red meat Conservatism" ... "Clickbait desperation" ... "Gratuitous trolling"
While reviewing GTA V
for the Mail, Del worried about “what it says about the coarsening, the
decadence and the hopelessness of our modern culture”, while in the Speccy it was “you can still act out your most politically incorrect fantasies without
some professional victimhood group like 350.org or Everyday Sexism demanding
you be carted off in the Outrage Bus for compulsory re-education”.
And there’s the switch: as Media Mole notes, this is about
GamerGate, “an astroturfed outrage which claims to
be about corruption in video games journalism, but which actually is
a bunch of players railing against imaginary ‘social justice warriors’
polluting their pastime with ideologies like ‘feminism’”. Delingpole is
using his Speccy article as leverage
to drive traffic for Breitbart London.
Look what the cat dragged in ... Milo Yiannopoulos
Media Mole closes by telling “It is also worth pointing out that Delingpole tells his readers to
search for a number of - abysmal and hateful - pieces on GamerGate by a man he
employs as a columnist at Breitbart, without disclosing their relationship”.
Now who might that be? As if you need to ask: step forward the singularly
repellent Milo Yiannopoulos, failed “entrepreneur”
and amateur human being.
This eminently avoidable presence has indeed been busy on
GamerGate, as
witness “How Sloppy, Biased Video
Games Reporting Almost Destroyed A CEO” (yes, there’s a “feminist activist” in there). Then
he told of “a secret video game
journalist mailing list” (obviously not, if he’s got it) “Some of whom attempted to bully their
colleagues with it in an attempt to shape the news agenda for political purpose”.
For God's sake visit Breitbart London
Yiannopoulos tells of “ideological
co-ordination” and “activists [sic]
members”, so those who look in on the
batshit Breitbarts know what they are meant to think. He then claimed those
on his list were saying “They’re on
to us” (as if anyone gives a flying foxtrot what he thinks) and tells of “The #GamerGate hashtag, which has swept
social media in recent weeks”. See, it’s really important!
We're not Astroturfing, honestly
The reality, as Del Boy let slip on Twitter as he implores
gamers to Retweet his Speccy piece, and Yiannopoulos says “look, it’s gone mainstream”, is that Breitbart London is
desperately seeking clickbait. This is nothing more than another lame attempt
to drive traffic: the venture
capitalists who shelled out for the site to get up and running are not of
charitable disposition.
One wonders if Fraser
Nelson is comfortable with his magazine being thus involved.
4 comments:
But there actually was a mailing list of over 150 journalists, with whole threads devoted to coming up with a party line on controversies, and people being pressured to conform to those party lines. Like, it literally did actually happen. The mailing list has a genuine thread titled "They are onto us" in which members of the mailing list discuss how to best kill the story that this list exists.
Let us say that the Breitbart people, and those of like mind, share a mailing list and discuss the line to take on a variety of subjects.
Does this make it some kind of corrupt activity, or is it merely a mailing list shared by a number of like-minded people?
Have a think about it, Master Yiannopoulos. And next time, own up and use your actual name.
Read the email dump and the reconsider your comment
If you are telling journalists and editors from a competing publication how to cover story, then yes, that is a demonstrable and unambiguous act of corruption.
This article is bloated on rhetoric and starved of facts.
Post a Comment