“BBC accused of
covering-up how it learned of Cliff Richard house raid by furious police chief
in charge of investigating the star ... The BBC has been accused of covering up
details of the controversial raid ... The corporation has received almost 800
complaints over its coverage”
thundered
the Daily Mail last month,
leaving readers in no doubt that The Beeb Done It.
Cliff Richard. And his hair
And, just in case
the headline didn’t do the trick, it was followed by “The police chief leading the investigation
into Sir Cliff Richard has accused the BBC of a ‘cover-up’ over how its
journalists learned the star’s house would be raided ... Chief constable David
Crompton said he had complained to the BBC about an article on its website
stating the force had deliberately attempted to ‘ensure maximum coverage’”.
This came hard on the heels of a
similar rant titled “BBC chief won't
say sorry for Cliff raid helicopter: Lord Hall defends coverage despite
hundreds of complaints”. As Sir Sean nearly said, I think we got the point.
So far, so typical: every opportunity for kicking the BBC must be ruthlessly
exploited. This is the word handed down by the legendarily foul mouthed Paul
Dacre.
However, and here we encounter a significantly sized
however, the Police force doing the complaining was South Yorkshire, which,
soon after the Mail laid into the hated Beeb, was one of the agencies
castigated for its part in the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal. So they
duly became the bad guys, which left the Dacre doggies with a problem over
Cliff’s apartment.
After both the
South Yorkshire Chief Constable and BBC DG Tony Hall appeared before
the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee and “chairman Keith Vaz accepted Mr Hall's comments and said that the
corporation had acted ‘perfectly properly’ in the way it reported the story”,
a U-turn was in order. Yes, for once, the Mail came down on the side of the
BBC.
“'Incompetence': MPs'
fury after police admit agreeing secret deal to tip off the BBC over planned
Cliff Richard raid” thundered
the paper yesterday, telling readers that Hall asserted “The reporter didn't have a story until he
went to South Yorkshire Police... and they gave him the story ... It was a
proper story for us to cover, in the right matter, proportionately, which I
think is what we did”.
Then the Mail put
the boot in: “The appearance before the committee
today comes at a turbulent time for South Yorkshire Police, which last week
came under fire for failing to protect vulnerable victims of crime. South Yorkshire Police's public protection unit,
which handles sex crimes such as rape, honour-based violence and domestic abuse,
had an 'unacceptable' culture”.
Daily Mail
supports BBC Shock Horror. On other
pages: man bites dog.
No comments:
Post a Comment