Those who are usually not backward in coming forward in
support of Education Secretary Michael “Oiky”
Gove, and their press cheerleaders, have today taken cover and kept schtum, and
for one very good reason: there is bad news in store for them and their hero.
As both the deeply subversive Guardian
and left-leaning Mirror have noted,
this is all about information.
Yes, like the central character in The Prisoner, Gove is being harried by hostile forces telling him “we want information”. And, as with the
response of Number Six, he is snapping back “you won’t get it”. But on this occasion, when the sentiment comes
back to him that “by hook, or by crook,
we will”, it isn’t a scarf-wearing Leo McKern, but the Information
Commissioner’s Office (ICO), speaking.
The subject of the argument, to no surprise at all, is Free
Schools, and the
request by Laura McInerney for a sight of “the application forms sent in by people applying to run free schools,
and the letters later sent back explaining whether or not they were successful”.
This would inform her quest to discover the criteria the Government was applying in the allocation and spending of taxpayer funds.
The costs are well-known: around £1.1 billion has already
been spent on Free Schools, with £241 million of that on schools opening in
areas where there is no shortage of places. And unlike all those Astroturf
lobby groups who keep their funding streams secret, this is money that has come
from the tax-paying public, and passed on whether they like it or not.
Such spending is now subject to Freedom of Information (FoI)
rules, but Gove has personally resisted Ms McInerney’s request, despite his
appeals thus far failing. The impression is given that the Government is trying
to make the process sufficiently expensive to frighten her off. However, and in
such cases there is inevitably a however, there are others seeking the same
information.
Under questioning from Green Party MP Caroline Lucas, Gove
told that it was “important we
protect those individuals who made proposals for schools that were not
accepted, from the programme of intimidation that has been directed at many
brave teachers by the National Union of Teachers and other extreme left-wing
organisations. I
make no apologies for protecting from intimidation those public-spirited people
who wish to establish new schools”.
But “Oiky’s”
strange parallel world of rotten lefty intimidation is no less a fantasy than The Prisoner’s village. There hasn’t been
any, the reality is that it’s our money, and we’re entitled to know how he and
his pals – silent today – decide to spend it. So let’s have that information freely
offered up, so we can see what’s going on.
One might ask: whose side is Gove on? Ah, but that would be telling.
1 comment:
This, for me, is evidence of Gove's limitations. If he can't defend his handling of his vanity policy directly - and he can't, it's painfully obvious from this pitiful excuse about phantom evil far-lefties - how would he be able to run anything bigger than the Dept of Education?
Clearly there's something fairly big he's very afraid of getting out - probably evidence of a lack of scrutiny (which would be enormously damaging given his desire to see the Dept for Ed running more and more things directly while laying off staff), or alternatively a partisan selection process (that's almost certain). But it will come out, one way or another.
It's also surely quite frustrating for those who actually want to start a free school to not have any info on why applications have not been successful?
Post a Comment