One has to wonder why someone with Charles Saatchi’s
intelligence – after all, he can’t have made his pile by not knowing one end of
business from the other – returns time and again to the
outside tables at Scott’s restaurant
in Mayfair, where he
had his well-documented domestic breakdown with Domestic Goddess (tm)
Nigella Lawson last year, knowing there will be a snapper in attendance.
But return he does, and regularly enough for him to
make an appearance in today’s Mail On
Sunday, which could be bad news for the supposedly reclusive
multi-millionaire. Stories kicked off in the MoS have a habit of getting legs in the Daily Mail the following week. And the reason he is in the MoS is, as with the bust-up with Ms
Lawson, what looks like an altercation with his current partner.
After Nigella decided she could manage fine without Mr
Happy, there appeared on the scene one Trinny Woodall (it may be my problem,
and mine alone, but there’s something pretentious about that name. Well,
whatever, eh?). The words of Caroline Aherne’s creation Mrs Merton come readily
to mind, from the time
she ambushed Paul Daniels’ partner Debbie McGee.
“So, what first
attracted you to the millionaire [insert name here]?” – OK, Ms Woodall is rumoured to be worth a few bob, but Saatchi,
by comparison, is minted. Or perhaps this is all evidence of more personal
cynicism. But what is not in question is that this looked like an opportunistic meeting of minds from the start,
whatever the reality. Now it looks
ominously like it is in trouble.
The MoS, which may
have been fastest on the draw with its wallet this time, was in no doubt as to
what was happening outside Scott’s: “What
did Saatchi say that made Trinny cry? Woodall in tears during row at the same
restaurant table where her millionaire partner attacked ex-wife Nigella Lawson”
howls the headline. The photos do not look good for Saatchi. So what have the
two said?
Tellingly, Saatchi was tetchy when the MoS caught up with him, and both he and Ms Woodall have since made
a statement through their lawyers. That means it’s potentially serious. And
there is more bad news for Charlie Boy: the spinner who so ineptly tried to put
the boot in on Nigella last time round, Andrew Hillgrove (aka The Twat In The
Hat) has just been convicted over an unpaid £100K tax bill.
On the other hand, when it comes to putting the case of
women who have suffered abusive relationships, the Mail is always able to call on either its own pundits, or, as
happened with Saatchi, they can get a freelance like Melissa Kite (see her
piece HERE)
to remind readers what Nigella, and now Trinny, may (allegedly) have endured. And
if there is disharmony chez Saatchi, that is what he’ll get.
A recluse who goes his domestic dirty laundry in public is not much of a recluse.
No comments:
Post a Comment