As the Lib Dems’ conference in Glasgow progresses, it is
becoming increasingly clear that the Coalition between Young Dave’s jolly good
chaps and Corporal Clegg’s motley platoon is not very long for this world. The
difficulty of riding what is increasingly resembling Low’s two-headed ass of
1918 to 1922 has spilled out into the open in a series of increasingly bitter
rows.
The latest dispute has been, to no surprise at all, the Tory
plan to do away with the Human Rights Act (HRA) – widely
applauded by their friends in the press until they discovered the rozzers
were snooping on them, and their hacks and pundits needed its services. The Lib
Dems, being genuinely in favour of liberty for all individuals, and not just
those with enough money, were having none of it.
This came hard of the heels of a bust-up between Clegg and
Theresa May over her desire to have even more powers to bang up More And
Scarier Muslims For The Political Benefit Of Herself Personally Now. The
propensity of the Tories to garner votes by threatening to come down hard on
people who aren’t going to vote for them knows no bounds. I’m keeping the front door securely locked.
And on top of all that was Clegg’s appearance on The Andy Marr Show (tm) yesterday
morning, where he talked of the Rt Hon Gideon George Oliver Osborne, heir to
the seventeenth Baronet, penalising the “working
poor” so the better-off do not have to contribute to future spending cuts (a
policy which, borrowing the language of the so-called Taxpayers’ Alliance, is
claimed to be “fair”).
Seeing the Lib Dems trying to enthuse themselves for the
coming General Election, the thought enters: would it serve any purpose for the
Coalition to continue all the way to the dissolution of Parliament next year?
Clegg and Cameron have already gone several months beyond what Bonar Law and
Lloyd George managed after the Great War. There is little likelihood of new
legislation being passed.
If Clegg and his colleagues are to avoid the loss of seats
being estimated (one recent one is from Iain Dale, who reckons 28, or around
half the current number), they need to differentiate themselves, and that might
mean admitting after the New Year that the Coalition has run its course. They
and Labour would still have the numbers to stop the Tories trying to pass any
of their wilder wheezes.
Clegg may once again do well in the leaders’ debates. But by
that time it may be too late to recover. If he is serious about being able to
present the Lib Dems as a credible alternative, he has to decouple his party
from the Tories, because if he doesn’t, well, look what happened to his
predecessors after 1922. Two years later, they were finished, and it took them
more than 70 years to recover.
You haven’t got that long, Nick. So do you agree with me? No pressure.
3 comments:
what a pile of shite.
@ Anon
Well that's a "stable" economy for you.
@ anon
yes but it is tory policy what can you do?
Post a Comment