So, dear floating voter, you’re thinking of putting your
cross next to the name of the UKIP candidate. After all, that Nigel Farage is
only saying what you’ve been thinking for years, isn’t he? If only the
Government had more chaps like him, eh? Even better, what if the Government was run by chaps like him? Well, before
you deploy that cross, perhaps you
should check out what that might mean.
Take that controversial energy policy, for starters: climate
change is held not to be happening, we’re told there is no point in doing
anything about it, and the flawed studies of Gordon Hughes, who missed the cost of
the gas out of his wind versus gas power comparison, are rolled out. And UKIP
think there are blackouts on the way because old power stations are being
closed.
The inconvenient fact – that new power stations, and not
just wind farms, are coming on stream all the time – gets lost in the hail of
misinformation. You can read the UKIP trip into the world of power generation
make believe HERE
[.pdf]. Note that it skates oh-so-lightly over the issues of nuclear power station
cost and the small matters of waste and decommissioning.
Then there is immigration, the supposed bedrock on which all
other UKIP policies are built. This would be drastically curtailed, although
exactly how this would be accomplished is not convincingly told. Sadly for this
idea, a recent study has
suggested that taking this action would cost the economy around £18 billion
over a five year period. And that wouldn’t be the only UKIP extra cost.
A programme of not only building nuclear power stations, but
also
more prisons and more warships, would depend on £120 billion being saved
annually elsewhere. Nige and his pals assert that this would come from not
being in the hated EU. But the
cost of membership is a mere fraction of that, and there would still – as with
Norway – be a cost attached to being outside.
Additionally, we would have to replicate EU wide bodies if
we were to insist on our own standards for agriculture, fisheries, competition
issues, food, and more – unless, of course, we were to do away with such
trivia, which would mean not being able to trade with the rest of the EU, and
more than likely the rest of the civilised world too. We would enjoy our
splendid isolation while the world passed us by.
But there would be lots of shale gas exploration, tax cuts
for the well-off (UKIP favour a flat tax), new aircraft carriers, education
vouchers, new flood defences, and compulsory tax discs for cycles. And we’d
have the freedom to catch as much fish as we wanted without anyone in Brussels
being able to do anything about it. Apart from split their sides laughing when the
stuff ran out.
People should look carefully what UKIP is really offering. Because it won’t work.
1 comment:
More prisons eh! A tacit acknowledgment that crime would increase under a UKIP government?
Post a Comment