The days since Margaret Thatcher died have seen some utterly
desperate examples of those who cling to selective interpretation and falsehood
as articles of faith, because they so dearly want to believe. There is a need
out there on the right for the faithful to assure themselves that nothing, but
nothing that Mrs T did was worthy of reproach. And that her successors believed
that, too.
So it must have come as a shock to her devotees when former
Deputy PM “Shagger” Prescott launched
a tirade against the Iron Lady in his Mirror
column on Sunday. A “tribute” to
her? That “would be the last word that could be used to describe what I wanted to
say”, confirmed Prezza.
This caused clear distress to the perpetually thirsty Paul Staines and his
rabble at the Guido Fawkes blog.
Fortunately, help
was at hand for the Fawkes folks in the shape of their new bosses at the
Murdoch press, where veteran whopper-teller Trevor Kavanagh was on hand today
to tell anxious readers “Blair
and Brown approved Thatcher funeral details years ago”. Yes, this news “destroys claims that Tories hijacked the ceremony
for political gain”. It does? How convenient is that, eh?
Kavanagh, in an unusually brief piece, manages nothing more
than “a source” in support, which
means it could have been whoever was within shouting range at Murdoch towers at
the time he cobbled his copy together. But it was good enough for the Fawkes
rabble, who declared “Prezza
attacks Tony and Gordon for Thatcher Funeral” without bothering to stop
and think.
We are now three years away from Pa Broon’s departure from
Downing Street. In the meantime, Young Dave and his jolly good chaps have had
plenty of time to stamp their own mark on the arrangements. It is significant
that Kavanagh managed not to go into any detail other than to assert that Blair
and Brown signed off on “a state funeral
in all but name”.
Call me sceptical, but I am sceptical, and if Staines and
his pals were capable of rational thought in the matter they would not be so
ready to take a bunch of proven porkie peddlers at their word. Blair and Brown,
for instance, had nothing to do with the wasteful and premature recall of
Parliament, and nor did they have any part in details such as the silencing of
Big Ben (Speaker Bercow made that call).
Nor would the numbers of armed forces’ personnel have been
previously cast in stone – or, for that matter, the scale of policing (just the
4,000 officers, it seems). But the Fawkes rabble can cling on to Kavanagh’s
drivel like a comfort blanket, and if it makes them happier, good for them. They
just shouldn’t expect anyone outside their jerking circle to be conned by such
an obvious whopper.
Even if it has been handed down by their bosses. Another fine mess, once again.
2 comments:
Even the name was changed by Cameron - originally called "Iron Bridge" (the Queen Mum's funeral was codenamed "Tay Bridge") he changed it to Operation "True Blue"
I use True Blue disinfectant blocks in my toilet. Should I be concerned?
Seriously, "Labour planned it" is well established and being trotted (sorry) out in every tabloid twice a day. Odd that the Eton Mess doesn't realise that a defence of "it's Labour's idea" makes the Tories sound pretty pathetic.
Post a Comment