The Coalition is not happy about the Bedroom Tax. And nor
are several of its supporters. Because, they say, it isn’t a
bedroom tax at all, because a tax is something that is paid on income, and
all that they’re doing is reducing Housing Benefit payments to those who have
spare rooms. So, instead, they assert that reference should
be made to a Spare Room Subsidy.
This is, sadly, total crap: for starters, one does not
merely pay tax on income, as anyone buying anything deemed to be luxury goods –
including flavoured sparkling mineral water – will know. You also pay VAT on
travel: if you avoid paying it on fuel for the car, you pay it on your train
fares. But, the protests continue, it’s not money you ever see if it’s housing
benefit.
And this much is true, but the Bedroom Tax meme has taken hold,
and once that happens, any attempt to pretend otherwise generally fails.
Changes to tax allowances that affect
older people were
instantly dubbed the “Granny Tax”.
Rises in VAT on static caravans were the “Caravan Tax”. And VAT on hot snacks
from Greggs instantly became the “Pasty
Tax”.
What also reinforces names like the Bedroom Tax is when it
is referring to something widely perceived as unfair. It’s all very well
telling someone with a two bedroom home who only uses one of those rooms to
downsize to a one bedroom place or take a housing benefit cut when there aren’t
any one bedroom homes around. And that is where we are right now.
Further reinforcement of names like Bedroom Tax comes when
the change only hits the less well off, and if we’re talking housing benefit
reductions, that’s exactly who it will hit. And it’s not as if this hasn’t
happened before: all those on the right who lionise the memory of Margaret
Thatcher manage to miss one bad mistake she made, and which contributed to her
downfall.
That mistake was called the Community Charge. What that? Well,
like the idea of a “spare room subsidy”,
the preferred name for this whizzo invention did not survive in the public
consciousness. Few nowadays can remember the Community Charge. But they can
remember the Poll Tax, which is what the Community Charge was almost
immediately dubbed. And it stuck.
Not even Mrs T at her loudest and most insistent could hold
back the tide: the riots in central London weren’t called Community Charge
Riots, were they? This ill-advised reform of local Government finance, which
helped The Iron Lady out the door of 10 Downing Street, and which was almost
immediately ditched by her successor, got the nickname it deserved.
And so has the Bedroom Tax. Its effect on the Coalition may be equally adverse.
2 comments:
No VAT on train fares. Or, rather, 0% VAT.
Given the way the mail has decided to smear the person who challenged IDS to live on £53 a week you can expect anyone to oppose the bedroom tax to get similar treatment
Post a Comment