In that parallel universe that is entered on crossing the
threshold of Northcliffe House, the legendarily foul mouthed Paul Dacre and his
obedient minions have once more worked their magic potion of paranoia and come
up with a scare story more frightening than anything since, er, maybe a week
ago. That strange being known as “the
left” has returned to take away the most beloved of tabloid memories.
“Princess
Diana fund cynically hijacked by the Left: How money is being diverted to
pro-immigration campaign fund” thunders the headline. Sadly,
though, there is no “pro-immigration”
campaign involved, the “left”
association is only in the minds of Dacre and his attack doggies, and there is
no “diversion” of funds. And, to put
the lid on it all, the Diana fund has actually
been wound up recently.
The target of this bile is something called Migration Observatory. It
is held to be part of “the left”
because it is advised by a Guardian journalist, and the husband of
another Guardian journalist. The
paper is then denounced as being “Left-wing”
(rather than just to the left of the Mail,
which is not quite the same thing), and there’s the guilt by association. So
what does Migration Observatory do?
The body “provides independent,
authoritative, evidence-based analysis of data on migration and migrants in the
UK, to inform media, public and policy debates, and to generate high quality
research on international migration and public policy issues”. And it’s
also
advised by the Sunday Telegraph’s
news editor. Why is it such A Bad Thing? Because its impartial analysis
undercuts groups like Migration Watch.
The latter, and its supremely litigious head Andrew Green,
clearly don’t like competition, especially when it shows them up. So word has
clearly gone out to twist the rationale of Migration
Observatory – good quality information to inform debate – and pretend that
this means it is in favour of immigration, when it does not make judgments
about whether this is a good or bad thing.
And what the Mail
clearly dislikes is that the Diana fund has given grants totalling over £7
million to a “Refugees and Asylum Seekers
initiative” (see the reasoning HERE).
This, though, is not “pro-immigration”.
It is helping the vulnerable and marginalised. In the perverse world of Paul
Dacre, doing such a thing without his express approval merely makes such groups
fair game for attack.
That includes taking the term “refugees” from the site of the Diana fund and changing it to “immigrants”.
It also includes smearing the fund’s initiative as “pro-immigration propaganda”. “The
aim of the scheme is to alter British attitudes to immigration” asserts the
Mail. But it makes no judgment on
immigration. This is just another slice of warped and angry intolerance and
bigotry.
As such, it fits right in at the Daily Mail. So that’s all
right, then.
No comments:
Post a Comment