When James Harding stood down – or, more accurately, was
forced out – from the editor’s chair at the Times,
the paper’s
newsroom was unusually quiet. Harding had earned the respect of his staff
and his peers during his five years in the hot seat, and at first there was
consternation over why Rupert Murdoch wanted him out. We can now say with some
certainty what the reasons were.
Although Harding’s tenure had not been faultless, marred
particularly by the “outing” of
Police blogger NightJack, he had steered a relatively impartial course,
reporting without restraint even on the unfolding events of Phonehackgate. But
while this may have been beneficial for the readers, it did not go down well
with Rupe. And nor did Harding’s even-handed approach to politics.
He was seen as too small-l liberal, the kind of approach
that did for Harold Evans before him: investigative journalism for Murdoch is
all very well, but there is an approved political line to take, and Harding was
not taking the hint and sticking to it. There was no secret why Andrew “Brillo Pad” Neil was so favoured by Rupe during his time at the
Sunday Times: he certainly did take the hint.
Neil was an unswerving supporter of the Tories at a time of
occasional controversy. Now Murdoch wants another in the same vein. That
Harding was a journalism and news man first and a politician last came
clear last week when he was appointed
as Director of BBC News and Current Affairs. Murdoch has made his move two
years before the next General Election, and for one reason.
Rupe wants to show the world that he is still strong, and
that means training all his firepower on getting his preferred candidate into
10 Downing Street. His support of Young Dave may have cooled, but the prospect
of Mil The Younger getting elected frightens him shitless. Tone he had a line
to; Miliband he does not. If you need confirmation of all that, another Murdoch
appointment has provided it today.
Step forward Tim Montgomerie, late of ConHome, and now the
Times’ Comment Editor. Not
for nothing did Peter Preston muse “Tim
Montgomerie may make the Times a more openly Conservative home”. He went on
“The question about Montgomerie ... has
long been whether, at root, he's a journalist or a political activist”.
Today, Monty has answered that one.
“Labour’s lead is only
7%! That’s BEFORE any recovery; BEFORE Fleet St turns on Miliband; BEFORE tax
bombshell attack” was the Monty line earlier today. A combination of
hopefulness (what recovery?), fantasy (how much more can the press attack
Miliband?) and giveaway. Plus it’s now glaringly obvious that the Times has lurched right and, like the Telegraph before it, ceased to be a
paper of record.
But good of Montgomerie to publicly admit it, as if anyone didn’t already know.
No comments:
Post a Comment