The Mirror has
today brought the sad news of the ultimate downfall of a pioneer of 1980s
Acid House raves: Tony Colston-Hayter had fallen victim to the temptation of
cyber fraud, and has been sent down for five and a half years, after he was
convicted in January of half-inching well over a million notes from customers
of Barclays and Santander.
But the Mirror
report does not mention one key player in Colston-Hayter’s past, the bloke he
introduced to the Acid House scene, where so many illegal and usually open-air
raves were set up at short notice, garnered huge crowds, and were often
summarily broken up as soon as the rozzers got wind of what was going on. The
identity of this fellow is well known to Zelo Street regulars.
Yes, step forward Paul Staines, who nowadays styles himself
Guido Fawkes. As the deeply subversive Guardian has told, Colston-Hayter “hired a bullish young publicist. Paul
Staines had first met Colston-Hayter a few years earlier at a national video
game tournament. A libertarian Conservative at university, he went on to work
for former Thatcher advisor David Hart”.
Hart was
a particularly nasty piece of work whose qualities have clearly rubbed off
on the thin-skinned and unpleasantly vindictive Staines. But Colston-Hayter
also left his mark on The Great Guido: after he took his first E at one of the
raves, he later recalled “It was pure
MDMA, and I was so out of it, so in love with everybody”. The two of them
launched the Freedom To Party campaign.
The Fawkes blog uses Freedom To Party as
one of its tags, and also refers on occasion to
Sunrise (the raves were known as Sunrise
parties). So one might have thought that Staines might publicly show his
support for his old sparring partner, who gave him that entree to the then
illegal rave scene. But that thought would have been misplaced: the Fawkes blog
hasn’t had so much as a peep about the news.
Nor has The Great Guido’s Twitter feed mentioned Colston-Hayter.
What is Staines’ problem? It can’t be the association with illegality, not with
Sunrise events breaking the law more or less whenever they were held, and the
still illegal drugs which were, as
the Mail sniffily noted, openly
on sale at those parties. The Great Guido did rather well out of his
association with Colston-Hayter.
So why is he so quiet today? It’s not as if Paul Staines
gets ashamed of much, if anything. Or is it yet another sign that The Great
Guido has sold out to the establishment he once pretended to oppose, and no
longer dares to rock the boat in case his new masters in the press find
adversely on his behaviour? Poor Tony Colston-Hayter – one of his oldest
friends doesn’t want to even mention him.
What profit a man, that he gain the world and lose his soul?
Another fine mess.
1 comment:
Apart from the character reference he gave to the judge you mean?
Post a Comment