To many peoples’ surprise, after he had previously suggested
his Christianity was akin to a radio signal that gets a bit fuzzy out in the
Chilterns, Young Dave has
now declared “I believe we should be
more confident about our status as a Christian country, more ambitious about
expanding the role of faith-based organisations, and, frankly, more evangelical
about a faith that compels us to get out there and make a difference to people's
lives”. Jolly good show, eh?
Or perhaps Cameron is trying to shift a little more
responsibility away from the state and on to churches, as well as charities, as
he also said: “In being confident about
our Christianity, we should also be ambitious in supporting faith-based
organisations to do even more”. Yes, that sounds familiar.
In any case, this apparent volte-face has not been
universally cheered, unless of course you read the part of the press that goes
in to bat for those who are, in the words of the odious Quentin Letts (let’s
not), “middle stump Anglicans”. So
the Maily Telegraph, Daily Mail and Murdoch Times were rather pleased by Dave’s
damascene conversion. Others were not so persuaded.
And so it came to pass that a group of public figures wrote
to the Tel to
signal a dissenting tone: “The group,
which includes writers such as Philip Pullman and Sir Terry Pratchett, Nobel
Prize winning scientists, prominent broadcasters and even some comedians argue
that members of the elected Government have no right to ‘actively prioritise’
religion or any particular faith”.
A little well-merited cynicism ((c) Steve Bell 2014)
The
letter went on “We are a plural
society with citizens with a range of perspectives and a largely non-religious
society. To constantly claim otherwise fosters alienation and division in our
society. Although it is right to recognise the contribution made by many
Christians to social action, it is wrong to try to exceptionalise their
contribution when it is equalled by British people of different beliefs”.
So far, so interesting, but over at Northcliffe House, the
smear machine was being fired up: “The
Prime Minister's assertion that Britain is a Christian country risks dividing
society, claim 50 liberals including Sir Terry Pratchett and Dan Snow” thundered
the headline over the by-line of the eponymous Daily Mail Reporter. That’s “liberals”,
as in right-wing abuse, by the way.
What the obedient hackery of the legendarily foul mouthed
Paul Dacre have failed to pick up on is that, yes, there is an element of
getting churches to intervene more in social issues, but the major part of
Cameron’s rediscovery of God is to reach out to more conservative Christians
upset over same-sex marriage, as Sunny Hundal has
pointed out. And, in any case, it’s not going to move the Tories’ vote
share forward.
Winging it is never a
good way to do electoral strategy.
2 comments:
“and, frankly, more evangelical about a faith that compels us to get out there and make a difference to people's lives”
Such as setting up food banks. Oh, wait a minute...
Presumably in these modern times Dr Johnson's remark about patriotism being the last refuge of the scoundrel now applies to the Prime Minister's religion. Equally, as with Blair, the more he talked of his honour, the faster we counted the spoons.
Post a Comment