So the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) has
finally published
the first part of its fifth assessment report, and the
findings are unequivocal: warming of the climate is real, it is almost
certain that mankind is responsible, it is unlikely that temperature rises will
be less than 2 degrees Celsius by the year 2100, and that means rising sea
levels, weather events and the rest.
Now, some
might view the conclusions, and that many commercial organisations are
feeding the findings into their risk management strategies for the coming
years, and conclude that the scientific approach has convinced even those who
previously doubted that warming was real. But they would be wrong, as the
sceptics, even though they cannot yet fault the findings, are spinning and
moaning as usual.
One of Anthony Watts’ pals has whined “I am watching the IPCC farce right now, North Korea would be proud of
this type of stitch up” (nothing to contribute, then). Andrew Montford, aka
Bishop Hill, dismissed all journalists present as “environmentalists” except for David Rose of the Mail On Sunday, who will be spinning the
findings at the weekend. And the press has more.
The Daily Mail, as
befits the excellent value extracted by Nigel Lawson from his lunch with the
legendarily foul mouthed Paul Dacre, tells readers “Is
this the evidence all those green taxes are cash down the drain? The world's
hardly got any hotter in the past 15 years!”, and that’s before any of
the hacks or pundits bothered to read a word. So the headline had already been
written (as usual).
The Maily Telegraph
makes
the pretence of straight reporting for once, but blots its already inky copybook
by accompanying
this with an editorial that starts by damning what it calls the “zealots” on both sides of the argument,
while making sure not to even mildly scold their own zealot, James “saviour of Western civilisation”
Delingpole, whose latest rant did not even wait for the IPCC to publish.
And, as the man said, there’s more: “Climate change campaigners have not been helped by the fact that their
advocates include some of the bossiest and most irritating people in politics.
When told by the likes of Chris Huhne, Caroline Lucas or Ed Miliband that they
must pay sky-high energy bills to plaster the country in ineffective wind
turbines, it is no wonder that the public are resentful”.
So that’s the usual stance by the back door, then. There
certainly won’t be any reining in of the likes of Christopher Booker, and his “nobody understands except myself”
nonsense. David Rose will be along on Sunday to pretend that he was told
whatever he’s going to make up in the meantime at the IPCC press conference.
And all other true believers that it isn’t happening will carry on as before.
Meanwhile, the world moves on, and all the moaning sceptics are out of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment