Circumferentially challenged Communities Secretary Eric
Pickles decided earlier this year to end the practice, known as “checking off”, by which his Civil
Servants have their Union subscriptions collected as a deduction from their
pay. Some of the Union bashing tendency claimed that this imposed a significant
extra cost on employers, but the annual amount – around £300 – was in the petty
cash category.
Fat Eric was egged on by the usual suspects on the right,
especially the perpetually thirsty Paul Staines and his rabble at the Guido
Fawkes blog, who mocked
the PCS Union for resisting what they called an “entirely reasonable” move. The Union, however, decided to take
Pickles to court, before anyone else in Government caught the habit and imposed
it beyond the DCLG.
And yesterday,
the PCS Union won their case: Fat Eric has ended up costing taxpayers
around £90,000, this being the costs of both parties. That money could have
paid for “checking off” in Pickles’
department for the next three hundred
years. The presiding judge ruled that Pickles’ move was a breach of
contract, something one might have expected him to have figured out beforehand.
Needless to say, those who pretend to be on the side of “Hard-working and hard-pressed taxpayers”,
such as the so-called Taxpayers’ Alliance (TPA), were silent for once: that a
Government minister has just sprayed £90k up the wall in pursuit of his own
misguided prejudice is suddenly no big deal, when the politician concerned is
one of their most ardent fans.
But the Fawkes rabble had to say something, and needed to
portray the setback as some kind of victory, or at least give the impression
that their side was actually in the right. And so it came to pass: “Pickles
Refuses to Back Down as PCS Get Off on Technicality” was the
magnificently crafted headline, which was an interesting way of telling readers
that their pal just lost.
That Fat Eric refused to back down is a statement of the
bleeding obvious: that’s why the whole thing ended up in court. And, as for the
“technicality”, that would be
something otherwise known as both a Contract Of Employment, and successive
agreements on pay and conditions between Government and Unions, which cannot be
unilaterally binned by diktat.
In other words, Pickles was in the wrong, he should have
engaged brain before wasting everyone’s time and money, and he’s been left
looking extremely foolish. Moreover, he’s unlikely to trust the Fawkes blog and
its hangers-on in Parliament for a very long time to come – not without making
sure he gets a second opinion first. So he isn’t the only one to have been
defeated yesterday.
Back to the drawing board for the Union bashers. Another fine mess, once again.
No comments:
Post a Comment