The Express recently
ran a story about Ryanair, the Millwall of air carriers (everybody hates us
and we don’t care), telling that one of their aircraft had landed at Alicante
airport without first getting clearance from the tower. Apart from it having happened over two years
ago, the paper missed out some of the detail. And that detail (see HERE
[.pdf]) shows this to have been a potentially deadly situation.
Three recent incidents, actually, Michael
The Boeing 737-800, with a total of 174 on board, was
inbound from East Midlands and had been cleared by Air Traffic Control (ATC) in
Valencia to descend and approach Runway 28 at Alicante. The Pilot Flying (PF),
who in this case was the co-pilot (and did not have an Airline Transport Pilot’s
Licence (ATPL)), confirmed he would call Valencia again once established eight
miles out.
He didn’t, and neither did Alicante tower take action until
the aircraft had landed. The PF had not gone through all of his landing
checklist, and so had not switched on the plane’s landing lights. This meant it
would have been very difficult in the dark conditions – a January night at just
before 2200 hours – to pick up the approaching aircraft from another plane on
the ground. That is important.
Alicante tower instructed the marshaller to stop the
aircraft short of its stand, as it had still not made contact. In the meantime,
another Ryanair plane had received permission to start up and be pushed back.
So a few minutes later on the approach and there could have been two of the
company’s 737s having a coming together on or near the runway.
Having been stopped short of the stand, the PF called to
find out what the problem was. But he called ... Valencia ATC! Only then did it
dawn on the pilots that they had not contacted Alicante tower. But on making
contact with the tower, they appeared to try and dodge the issue, the PF asking
“We reached our stand without ... we just
wait for the marshaller ... would you define the problem?”
The response was terse and immediate: “The problem is you landed without clearance”. It got worse: the
Flight Data Recorder and Cockpit Voice Recorder data was not saved and was
therefore not available to investigators. And this is not an isolated incident:
last October, a Ryanair 737 took off from Eindhoven
airport using the wrong holding point and without clearance.
And only last month a Ryanair flight landing at Dublin
airport missed
a runway exit and then did a 180 degree turn, heading back along and
blocking the runway, forcing other aircraft to go around. The Spanish investigation
did not show how many hours the pilots had done in the last 28 day period (as
AAIB reports do), which would be instructive. All these incidents suggest
someone is being overworked.
Yes, Ryanair’s safety record has been good for its 28 year
existence. So far.
2 comments:
I've always thought that when Ryanair has its first fatal crash, the firm will go bust. No one will trust it, which is what makes O'Leary's aggressive PR strategy so strange.
What about the fire on the Ryanair Dublin - Stansted flight on 27/2/2002? It landed with an engine on fire. Not their fault, but when the pilot finally understood the message he stopped the plane in a position with the fire upwind of the fuselage - exactly what caused the Manchester disaster to get out of hand. And when the Stansted Fire Controller advised them to evacuate on the left side only they lost that message as well and opened the doors on the right (into the fire).
http://www.aaib.gov.uk/cms_resources.cfm?file=/dft_avsafety_pdf_029538.pdf
Post a Comment