This morning, Young Dave will not be a totally happy
chappie. Nor, one suspects, will he have been backward in coming forward to
issue an Olympic sized bollocking to whoever thought it would be a jolly good
wheeze to mosey over to Kent on
a tour of villages worst affected by the recent severe weather. Because
that visit ended up making Cameron look weak and ineffective.
For some, these visits are risk-free: had the Prince of
Wales been visiting, he could have deployed a suitably furrowed brow, listened
intently to residents, those from the emergency services, and others working to
clear floodwater and restore power, told how terribly ghastly the weather had
been, assured all present that something would be done, and piled off back to
Kensington Palace, happy at a job well done.
But then, he isn’t in Government, and nor are opposition
politicians, who can also make hay at the Coalition’s expense with flying
visits and sympathetic ears. It is very different for Cameron. There is no
higher elective office. The buck cannot be passed any higher. The public
assume, rightly or otherwise, that he is the one person who can pull the levers
and make things happen.
So, when the PM arrived
in the Kent village of Yalding with the broadcasters in tow, he should have
known what would happen. And it did happen: one resident told him “We were literally abandoned. We had no
rescuers, no nothing for the whole day ... we’ve had no support. We’ve had no
electricity and we’ve still got no electricity ... the council – we’ve been
trying to contact them since Monday, and nothing”.
It will not have helped the Cameron mood that the council
concerned is controlled by his party. Another resident concluded “My frustration is that until Cameron came we
had been left abandoned ... When we knew he was coming this morning the police
showed up, the council turned up but until then the only people helping us were
volunteers. It was just a publicity stunt”. Oh dear.
Cameron’s protestation that resources were being put into
flood defences was
utterly false: soon after the Coalition came to power in 2010, that budget was
cut by £170 million as the department concerned looked to deliver cuts of
29%. Many schemes did not go ahead. Maintenance of existing defences was cut
back. The Guardian reported that scores
of schemes had not been progressed as a result.
All of this information was bound to be sought out as soon
as Cameron opened his mouth. Thus another good reason for him not to have made
that visit: there are plenty of more junior ministers who could have done the
job, and taken the flak without attracting so much media attention. Whoever
thought it was a good idea to expose Young Dave to all of that will be in the
doghouse today.
But good of them to show where this Government’s priorities
lie. Well done that man!
1 comment:
I wonder if the following have affected the ability of UK Power Networks to deal with high demand of power faults?
In November 2010, EDF sold it to Hong Kong based Cheung Kong Group (CKG), owned by billionaire Li Ka Shing (who had only philanthropic intents, I'm sure)
In September 2011, 600 job cuts were announced
http://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/9273802.Workers_face_axe_from_UK_Power_Networks/
In 2012, this puff piece states that UK Power Networks were seeking a 20% reduction in costs. How did they achieve that, I wonder?
http://www.supplymanagement.com/news/2012/uk-power-networks-chops-tree-cutting-spend-by-28-per-cent
Can't help feeling there's a story here somewhere.
Post a Comment