In August, the Daily
Express, reverting to its default behaviour as the Daily Diana, told
readers “SAS
Link To Diana’s Death”. This was followed the next day by “Diana
Death: Demand For New Inquiry”, with relatives of Henri Paul, the
driver with a drink problem who was way over the drink-drive limit, and “sources” close to Mohamed “you can call me Al” Fayed agreeing
wholeheartedly.
It was crap then, and now it's officially crap
And the Express
kept up the pretence, returning the following week with “Diana
Death: The Two Mystery Cars”, by which time desperation was setting in,
as readers were told that someone heard the two impacts from the fatal crash,
went back to bed, and then later got up and saw two other cars driving in close
formation down a street not far away from the scene of the accident.
All of this had been prompted by a letter sent by “Soldier N”, former housemate of Danny
Nightingale, who was court martialled after a gun was found in his possession following
a tour of duty. Soldier N’s behaviour was “allegedly
erratic and threatening” towards his then wife, the daughter of the couple
who wrote the letter to the Commanding Officer of the SAS. And his was the sole
testimony.
Now, call me cynical, but I am cynical. It was so obviously
unreliable as to put off most of the rest of the press pack, which means it had
to be very shaky indeed. Fortunately, the deeply subversive Guardian is
on the case today: “New Police inquiries
have rejected suggestions that the SAS was involved in the deaths of Diana,
Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed, according to reports”.
And Sky News (“first
for breaking wind”) has the Met telling “Whilst there is a possibility that the alleged comments in relation to
the SAS's involvement in the death may have been made, there is no credible or
relevant evidence to support a theory that such claims had any basis in fact”.
This is a polite way of concluding that Soldier N was bragging. So their
conclusion?
“Having reviewed the
exercise and its findings, I am satisfied there is no evidential basis upon
which therefore to reopen any criminal homicide investigation or refer the
matter back to the coroner. In light of this information, I have today also
written to the Royal House and Lord Justice Baker informing them of the above
and providing a copy of the concluding summary”.
That means this is another overblown shock horror story that
was not worth all the newsprint dedicated to it – on top of all the other
wastes of space that the Express has
perpetrated in the past 16 years. After all the wacko conspiracy theories, the
fact remains that Diana, Princess of Wales died because her driver was half cut,
he was going way too fast, and she wasn’t wearing a seatbelt.
Still, scares move papers, and that makes them another Benchmark Of Excellence!
No comments:
Post a Comment