There is a saying in God’s Own County relating to any piece
of work that is considered next to worthless: “I wouldn’t pay you in washers for that”. Well, such workmanship
also exists in supposedly credible national newspapers, like the Express, and one particularly deserving
washer recipient is Frederick Forsyth, whose
latest rant has clearly not been subjected to the most basic fact check.
Fred starts off his anti-EU rant by telling how what was
then the EEC had just six members when we joined, of which the Benelux
countries were “tiddlers”. Go and say
that loudly in downtown Rotterdam of a weekend. And then “When we joined in 1973 along with Ireland and Spain that made nine”.
Spain joined when it was still a dictatorship, did it? He should have said
Denmark.
Then he talks of former Warsaw Pact countries joining the EU
following the fall of the Iron Curtain, and tells how Czechoslovakia and
Hungary were “desperately poor”. Been
there of late, Fred? Thought not. They’re maybe not as expensive to live in as
the UK, but there’s nothing “desperate”
about them. Never mind, he also says Slovenia is poor. So he hasn’t been there,
either.
And then we get onto borders: “To this you can add the most generous and gullible social services in
Europe and porous borders. Why not move and improve yourself? Why not bring the
family and settle? There is absolutely nothing we can do about this”. He
hasn’t tried to claim benefits recently, either, or he’d know there is nothing
generous about the system. Or that EU migrants don’t come here for that.
In Forsyth’s world, migration is only an east to west
phenomenon. It’s as if those two million Brits who have migrated south and
south-east did not exist. And, as his argument is based on the idea that all
the bad things about EU migration come out of former Communist states, he
ignores southern European migration, especially from countries like Portugal
and Italy.
“But if western Europe
is a magnet to the ambitious young of the old communist states why is Britain
the biggest magnet of all? Simple. It's the language” he asserts, and once
again the larger picture is discarded: if any one EU member state is a “magnet”, it’s Germany, and Forsyth’s
strange argument that being taught English as a second language means they’re
all coming here falls flat.
“Our politicians
signed away our border sovereignty years ago and short of leaving the union
there is no way we can re-establish it”. We had large-scale migration
before joining the EEC, we’d still have it if we left. That’s part of how
countries evolve. I do hope Richard “Dirty”
Desmond isn’t actually paying Forsyth to write this singularly un-researched
drivel – he’d be better off getting an office junior to do it.
Forsyth once wrote properly researched novels. How the mighty are fallen, eh?
3 comments:
Is Forsyth still resident in Ireland because of its tax laws?
Tim: Forsyth involved himself heavily in research re his novels ( allegedly he made enough from 'the day of the jackal' to retire) and for this he deserves respect.
But much of what he wrote afterwards is utter bilge (I'm including 'the Odessa file', which read well in '78 when I was 15 but now comes across as shite - notwithstanding the Simon Wiesenthal thing).
He represents a shrinking constituency of flag-waving OAP's who still can't accept 'loss of empire'.
Tolerance , Tim. Tolerance.
Of course Forsyth gets paid for this - in fact, the brief from Richard Desmond is probably to whip up as much anti-EU hysteria as possible irrespective of the facts.
Post a Comment