What am I bid for this article? Yes Sir, the bid's with you
“Instead of democracy, we’re governed by unelected officials who reach their decisions in secret, often after being lobbied by vested interests”. Not true: the final decisions are made by the European Parliament, which is directly elected. That’s not instead of democracy, it IS democracy.
“Instead of personal liberty, we have a mass of pettifogging regulation that makes us poorer and less free”. Opinion, and false equivalence: personal liberty is not necessarily eroded by regulation.
“Again and again the EU has pursued regulation as an end in itself - not in response to a specific need, but as a step towards federation”. Opinion, but with added scaremongering.
“The hassle of opening a bank account? Blame the EU’s Money Laundering directive”. Fifteen minutes if they’re running a little slowly today.
“End of weekly recycling collections? That’s the EU’s Landfill directive”. Not true. That’s down to local authority budget constraints, and recycling, Dan, is the stuff that does NOT go into landfill. Have a think about it.
“The ban on minimum alcohol pricing? That’s the EU’s Technical Standards Directive”. Not true. There is no ban on minimum alcohol pricing - see HERE.
“For the sake of the 10 per cent of our economy that is linked to the EU, we must apply 100 per cent of EU rules to 100 per cent of our business”. Let’s take this nice and slowly, shall we? How much d’you think it would cost to run two different sets of regulations in order to satisfy Hannan’s ideological impulses? Who would draw up and implement those Good Old British standards, and how much extra would it cost us?
“European integration was supposed to make people wealthier, but the EU has fallen from 30 per cent of the world economy in 1980 to 17 per cent today”. False equivalence. The implication is that the EU has caused a reduction in living standards, but this assumes the rest of the world remains as it was in 1980. Given recent growth rates in countries like China and India, that assumption does not hold.
“Without doing anything improper, an MEP who makes full use of his allowances can take home, net, considerably more than the British Prime Minister”. False equivalence. The PM gets his security, transport and a central London house (ie 10 Downing Street) thrown in. An MEP does not.
Membership of the EU brings its irritations, but it will do Daniel Hannan’s cause no good if he continues to be passionate and committed, but flagrantly dishonest.
He can't just resign, though, can he? He'd lose his salary and expenses. And he needs to wait till he's deselected or voted out so he has something to moan about
Where does not-so-bright-bulb Dan think the older, less efficient bulbs were manufactured?
As a civil servant, I'm restricted from commenting.
Dimmer lightbulbs? Energy saving led lightbulbs have been able to put out more, better light than the old incandescent type loved by Mail readers for a while now...
He probably thinks because an LED is only maybe 4w it cannot be as bright as a 100w filament bulb. He proves he's not the brightest bulb in the box with his latest nonsense.
"...passionate and committed..."
The new lying.
Which makes Hannan a liar. Or a misled dope. One way or the other I wouldn't employ him to be a cleaner in the Scrubs, never mind an MEP. Whoever voted for the clown own up NOW.
Increased wealth is a different issue from an increase in the share of the world economy. Basic mathematics. This just means that China and India have grown faster than the EU. But they have grown more than the USA and Japan too.
Which is worse? 1. He knows he's talking bollocks. or 2. He doesnt know he's talking bollocks. You decide. I cant.
Post a Comment