Yes, the first holiday charter flight I ever took was – this
despite living around 150 miles away at the time – from Luton Airport. It was
the original gateway to the world of package holidays, even when the plane was
a Monarch Airlines Bristol Britannia which took three and a half hours to reach
Palma de Mallorca. But now, someone has had the whizzo idea of making it the
latest New London Mega Airport.
Bit like this, only inland
Indeed, the ostensibly reasonable idea has been trailed in
the Standard, under the headline “Heathrow
battle: how Luton could be ‘England’s airport’”, which will have
come as a surprise not only to the town’s residents, but also everyone involved
with the current airport operation. The latter will be especially surprised, as
they may have been involved with the
Masterplan for its development.
And that Masterplan, although it envisages some development
of the airport to make more use of the runway and build up the capacity of the
site to a potential for handling around 18 million passengers per annum,
categorically excludes any new
runways – the artist’s impression in the Standard
piece shows four, three more than at present – and even rules out lengthening the one they already have.
Why this might be can be explained by looking at the
ownership and management structure of Luton Airport: although it is run by a
private consortium, ultimately the
buck stops with the owners, the local council. Thus the sensitivity to any
over-development and associated increase in aircraft activity, together with
the attendant noise and particle emissions that would result.
This, though, does not appear to have troubled the Standard, which talks of Crossrail 2
somehow appearing at the airport, although it is currently slated to come no
nearer than Epping (this is a long way from Luton). London First is
seeking to modify the nature of the Crossrail 2 project in advance of a
review of the currently protected route, but again, this is no guarantee of it
happening.
And whoever dreamt up the Luton mega-expansion idea may not
have visited the place: the airport is perched on top of a hill to the south of
the town, with any significant extension of the runway meaning several millions
of cubic metres of infill to enable it to happen. The scale would dwarf that
needed for the second runway at Manchester Airport. Put directly, it isn’t
going to happen.
Whatever the solution to London’s air transport needs, it
will require a little more than an architect from the Ron Hopeful school, an
identikit futuristic four runway mock-up (this one does look more than a little
like the Boris Island impression), and stories of new road and rail links. For
starters, it might just involve a little consultation with the people who
actually own the place before sounding off.
So that’s another pipe dream for the bin. No change there, then.
1 comment:
I think it should be a requirement that anyone writing of siting a prospective London airport or expanding an existing one should declare where they live. As someone born and brought up in Essex, I have a suspicion that all the advocates of Boris Island or the neighbouring sites, live nowhere near the Medway towns or south Essex but as both areas are neither posh nor affluent, they are expendable to the flying classes.
Post a Comment