The rabble at the Guido Fawkes blog clearly believed
yesterday that it was on to a winner: the Huffington
Post UK had fixed on the corporate tax affairs of coffee chain Starbucks, revealing
that they had traded in the UK for 14 years, had paid a grand total of £8.6
million in Corporation Tax in that time, and nothing at all for the past three
years. So what was the problem for the Fawkes folks?
Arianna shows her grave concern at the Fawkes allegations
Well, firstly the HuffPo
had got a story that the Fawkes blog hadn’t. Moreover, as I’ve noted
previously, the site is getting more and more popular and – uncomfortable as it
may be for some – more trusted. The perpetually thirsty Paul Staines, his tame
gofer the odious flannelled fool Henry Cole, and newly appointed teaboy Alex
Wickham, scored
a measly 4% positive trust score in a recent poll.
And on top of all that, despite the efforts of the Fawkes
rabble and their Stateside pals, the HuffPo
appointed Mehdi Hasan as its political editor recently, and has not sacked him.
So there had to be a counterblast to the Starbucks story, which Wickham was
instructed to cobble together. This asserted
that the HuffPo were hypocrites as their parent company is registered in
Luxembourg.
So far, so predictable, but the unintended foot-in-mouth
moment was in the detail. Wickham also asserted “Another headline clearly demonstrating how Mehdi Hasan’s appointment
has shifted Arianna Huffington’s website markedly to the left”. So it can
be concluded that (a) going after Starbucks’ tax affairs is a leftie thing, and
(b) one would expect the Fawkes blog to be equally quick to jump on anyone else
doing it.
And both conclusions were shown to be, as with so much
Fawkes product, infinitely flexible this morning, as the mouthpiece of Staines’
favourite serving editor, Paul Dacre – yes, the right-leaning Daily Mail – went after Starbucks while
the Fawkes folks remained totally schtum.
First
came a “news” item telling of “Fury over coffee giant’s clever accounting
techniques”, and then came the “comment”.
That
was particularly scathing: “It is the
stench of corporate hypocrisy”. The piece savages Starbucks’ ethical
outlook. Then there is a killer quote: “this
vastly wealthy, insufferably smug corporation, which wields so much power that
British politicians do not dare to stand up to it, goes to inordinate lengths
to shield its profits from paying a reasonable rate of tax, as almost every one
of its customers has to do”.
So, Fawkes folks, let’s see you denounce the Daily Mail as having “shifted ... markedly to the left”. It
won’t happen, of course: the only reason for having a pop at the HuffPo is to
try and pull it down a peg or two and do some damage – with a side order of
smearing Mehdi Hasan. There’s no consistency or principle at work here, just a
cynical attempt to profit not by improving themselves, but by kicking others.
It won’t work. And Arianna won’t take any notice. Another fine mess, once again.
No comments:
Post a Comment