In the wake of pantomime villain Abu Hamza being deported to
the USA – where he has now appeared in court as the first stage in his journey
through the Stateside judicial system – there just had to be an intervention by
the Daily Mail’s tedious and unfunny
churnalist Richard Littlejohn on the subject. And he has not disappointed his
legions of devoted readers this morning.
Crims, Guv? They're all darkies, innit?!?
“Foreign
criminals can sleep easily in soft-touch Britain. No wonder Captain Hook feels
hard done by” proclaims the headline, followed by the usual
recycling of “Yuman Rights”, which
are once again held to be “pernicious”.
We apparently can’t even deport crims back to EU countries, so Dick tells us.
Except his
fellow hacks are complaining about the cost of, er, deporting folks to EU
countries.
Ah, but he has an example, a woman who was convicted but not
sent back to Romania. Yes, Dicky boy, because her son speaks English as his
first language and he’s at school here. I expect that in the retelling the Mail may find that a cat is also
involved. But when Littlejohn comes to quoting some figures, he and his paper
come badly unstuck – and not for the first time.
“Scotland Yard has
announced it is arresting almost 200 foreign criminals a day in London. That’s
every single day, every week, every year. Call it 73,000 a year in round
figures” he asserts. Wrong. The “almost
200” is the number of suspects
arrested. Of these, just a third are held and questioned. So that 73,000 is in
fact more like 24,000 – but only if all
those questioned are convicted.
That’s doubtful, to say the least. And merely being found in
possession of a foreign sounding name is not yet a criminal offence in England
and Wales. Let’s do a quick and dirty calculation: if all of those 24,000 were
convicted and half went to jail, that would be more foreign nationals in jail
that the
entire foreign national prisoner population. And that’s just for Greater
London.
Replicated throughout the country, that would be around
70,000 new prisoners every year, so either they’re being banged up for less
than eight weeks on average – doubtful if there are instances of murder, robbery,
rape and other violent crimes – or only a fraction of those questioned are
actually being convicted. Put more directly, Richard Littlejohn is once again
being casually dishonest.
And he’s also slipping in the odd slice of casual racism: “Every time the Yard puts out one of its
‘Britain’s Most Wanted’ posters, at least 75 per cent of them have foreign
names”. Ho yus. So what’s a foreign name, then, Dicky boy? What qualifies a
name to be British? I never knew there were rules that had to be obeyed before
names could be considered not to be foreign. You learn something every day.
This column is intolerant, dishonest and racist by turns. No change there, then.
No comments:
Post a Comment