ONE ROGUE COPPER?
With party conference season in full swing, Rupe and his
troops might have thought that Phonehackgate would take a back seat for a few
weeks. But the lifting of reporting restrictions today on a case where a senior Police officer has
been charged with breaking the Official Secrets Act has changed all that.
The activities of those at the now defunct Screws
are once again back in the spotlight.
What makes this case stand out is that DCI April Casburn,
who has
been charged additionally with “misconduct
in a public office” back in September 2010, was not some rank and file
copper. She had been, according
to the deeply subversive Guardian,
“head of the National Terrorist Financial
Investigation Unit which supports some of the most sensitive police inquiries”.
Have a think about that: a Detective Chief Inspector from
the counter-terrorism branch stands accused of offering documents to the Screws, apparently in exchange for
money, and it has been alleged she had secret documents at home without having
obtained permission to keep them there. The documents are apparently to do with
Operation Varec, which precluded Operation Weeting.
Varec – and my thanks
here to the excellent Brown Moses blog – began as a following up of assertions
by a team from the New York Times that Andy Coulson knew more about
Phonehackgate than he was letting on. So it appears that the officer concerned
was offering the Screws information
about the Police investigation into, well, the Screws.
Varec was intended to provide information to support the
decision as to whether the Police investigation into phone hacking and tapping should
be reopened (it will be recalled that Yates Of The Yard had earlier summarily
decided not to proceed, despite the Met sitting on Glenn Mulcaire’s rather
large pile of singularly incriminating evidence). Telling the Screws about that is a more than eyebrow
raising prospect.
What is also eyebrow raising is that the conclusions from Varec,
having been referred to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), appear to have resulted
in the decision not to proceed due to there being insufficient evidence. Think
about that one: the Mulcaire notebooks alone were more than enough to proceed.
And that conclusion came after the Screws
was tipped off.
So was the contact with the Screws just a one-way thing? Or did the Murdochs exert some
influence on the Met in order to get them to tone down what was sent to the
CPS? As with the idea of there being “one
rogue reporter”, the idea that April Casburn was acting alone while her
colleagues were all white as the driven snow defies belief. Does it stink, or
does it stink? Either way, it stinks.
3 comments:
Varec is some kind of pressure relief valve. The people who invent these names obviously have a great sense of humour.
Guano
It looks like DCI Casburn's leak led to NI's orgy of e-mail deletion and computer-smashing. Operation Varec didn't relieve the pressure; it set off a chain of events which blew the gasket.
I have to wonder whether Casburn was acting on her own in this? Did NI approach her for information? Did someone else in the Met suggest that she tip-off NI that this time the Met were taking things seriously?
Guano
Visitor to Wolfson College, Cambrige, 2004-5.
see p.43 for nice photo
http://www.wolfson.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/media/magazine-29.pdf
Same time at Wolfson as DCI Michael Forteath of SO15. (he started work just 4 days before 7/7 in the anti-terrorist branch.
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/j7-jean-charles-de-menezes-inquest/de-menezes-inquest-transcripts/sep_30.pdf
Post a Comment