It was only last month that Reuters reported that “U.S. President Donald Trump’s former political strategist Steve Bannon has been in contact with three potential rivals to British Prime Minister Theresa May … Bannon said he had been in direct contact with [Boris] Johnson and two other potential challengers to May”. And there was more.
“‘Boris Johnson is one of the most important persons on the world stage today,’ Bannon said. He described Johnson as ‘his own guy’ and said he had ‘texted a lot’ with him and spoken by phone with him during this month’s London trip”. Just how much “his own guy” London’s formerly very occasional Mayor Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson really is, we found out when his latest “chicken feed” generating column for the Telegraph appeared.
Steve Bannon is a white supremacist bigot who worked for an alleged President who demonises Muslims. So, to no surprise at all, as the BBC has reported, “Mr Johnson … was commenting on the introduction of a burka ban in Denmark … He said he felt ‘fully entitled’ to expect women to remove face coverings when talking to him at his MP surgery - and schools and universities should be able to take the same approach if a student ‘turns up... looking like a bank robber’”. Bozza feeling “fully entitled” with women, eh?
Then he lost it completely. “If you tell me that the burka is oppressive, then I am with you … If you say that it is weird and bullying to expect women to cover their faces, then I totally agree - and I would add that I can find no scriptural authority for the practice in the Koran … I would go further and say that it is absolutely ridiculous that people should choose to go around looking like letterboxes”. Whistle those Gammon Doggies™!
The condemnation was swift to arrive. “The assistant secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, Miqdaad Versi, said Mr Johnson was ‘pandering to the far right’”. Pandering? He’s positively baying for attention.
Why that might be was explained by Labour MP David Lammy. “Muslim women are having their burkas pulled off by thugs in our streets and Boris Johnson's response is to mock them for 'looking like letterboxes’ … Our pound-shop Donald Trump is fanning the flames of Islamophobia to propel his grubby electoral ambitions”.
The Right Honourable Member for Tottenham was correct, with Adam Bienkov coming to the same conclusion: “The fact that Boris Johnson believes comments like these will help him win the Tory leadership tells you everything you need to know about the Islamophobia problem in the Conservative party”. And he had one more observation.
“While at the Spectator, Boris Johnson defended Islamophobia as a ‘natural reaction’ to Islam and questioned the loyalty of Muslims in the UK”. How to get away with the anti-Semitic “disloyal Jew” trope? Change it to “Muslim” and hey presto! All is acceptable.
Bozza has always been a bigot, and thus far has been able to laugh it off. Small wonder Bannon targeted him. And this latest outburst means one thing.
Boris Johnson believes this will help propel him to the Tory leadership, and then to electoral success. That means the Tories are still the Nasty Party.
Enjoy your visit to Zelo Street? You can help this truly independent blog carry on talking truth to power, while retaining its sense of humour, by adding to its Just Giving page at
There is a dreadful shock coming to those who think this is as far right as the country can go.
The process instigated in 1979 has gathered pace ever since.
There is worse to come. Much worse.
All of our defensive institutions have failed at every level. For the most part our politicians have morphed almost en masse into a gang of conniving, unprincipled warmongering scoundrels and thieves. Our media are little more than vehicles for lying and continuing the horror. Our economy is a giant ponzi scheme waiting for the next inevitable collapse.
Why be surprised when such a "culture" vomits up lumps like Johnson or May or Benn or Cable. These people and their media jobsworths are there because they do indeed represent a deluded society lurching toward collective insanity.
The only question is how many more lives it will immolate before dying of its own poison.
So called islamophobia is indeed the natural reaction to islam, which has nothing to give us that we need. It must not be accepted without question, all aspects of this regressive ideology and must be held to account.
Just because you don't like the people doing the questioning isn't a valid reason for closing down debate about islam. Otherwise when it forces us to confront it that will be too late.
"That means the Tories are still the Nasty Party."
Do you mean that they ever stopped being the nasty Party? When did this happen?
Maybe I blinked and missed it.
Really Anonymous? That's similar to saying antisemitism is a natural reaction to the Likkud government of Israel, which let's face has nothing to give us that we need. You fight all forms of racism. Cherry picking doesn't work.
So called islamophobia, an invented word, is not the equivalent of anti-semitism. I fight all racism, but one is allowed to dislike ideologies and to dislike islam doesn't make you a racist, there is no one islamic race, but to be anti-semitic does.
Of course I was forgetting the present day norm that if you only criticise one side you must support the other, so I can be baselessly accused of cherry-picking.
Post a Comment