One of the issues that would not go away during the last
years of Margaret Thatcher’s time at 10 Downing Street was whether or not
Sterling should join the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM). One
protagonist who backed the move, and ultimately resigned his office in protest
at the lack of movement on the matter, was Nigel Lawson.
Today, that same Nigel Lawson is telling whoever wishes to
listen that the UK
should leave the EU – the exact opposite of what he was so passionately
advocating back in 1989. Some are surprised at his pronouncement. They should
not be: Nige has already called for the Euro to be “dismantled
in an orderly way”. This, too, is the polar opposite of his previously
held view.
We need only look at where the Lawson bombshell – or damp
squib, as it is likely to be remembered – was dropped: at the Murdoch Times, where it was enthusiastically
talked up by Rupe’s new recruit Tim Montgomerie. Monty is an anti-EU shill, and
this is part of why he has been recruited. As his new boss would have expected,
he has brought in and promoted the kind of views that Murdoch wants to hear.
Murdoch droid gets it wrong ...
After all, Rupe despises the EU: not only is it a huge
market, but also one where those pesky Brussels Eurocrats have a habit of
trying to enforce a level playing field. And fair competition is something that
only interests Murdoch if it is in his interest. If Rupe’s already a dominant
market force, he would rather the regulators look somewhere else and leave him
to screw his competitors.
So is this intervention significant? Put bluntly, no it isn’t:
Lawson is a has-been, whose anti-EU stance is already well known, as is his
willingness to shill for the climate change denial lobby. He was a bloody awful
Chancellor of the Exchequer, whose late 80s boom may have halved unemployment,
but the succeeding bust restored the dole queues.
... followed by a Tory crawler
And his advocacy of ERM membership, later realised by his
successor “Shagger” Major, ended up
with the debacle of Black Wednesday in September 1992, the result of using high
interest rates to help pretend Sterling was worth more Deutschmarks that was
the case. In this, the Tories repeated Winshton’s 1925 mistake, as had Labour Governments
in 1946 and 1967.
The only notable side-effect of Lawson’s article is how
Montgomerie’s promotion of it has been so grovellingly echoed by the likes of
Tory MP Stewart Jackson, another of the Europhobic fringe. Other than that
momentary amusement, and all the associated (and misguided) calls for the
Tories to lurch a bit more to the right, the Lawson clarion call can be
usefully consigned to the bin.
Yes, there goes Nigel Lawson ... on his way out.
2 comments:
have I just posted something under Nadine Dorris by mistake??
Now you tell me.
Post a Comment