Whenever the Fourth Estate talks of the Leveson Inquiry, the
line so often taken is that it has been the very presence of its hearings and
report that somehow constrains, “chills”,
or gags the press. So to see the Evening
Standard bravely splash
the news that, on one significant occasion, the Leveson Inquiry was itself
gagged, by the order of the Metropolitan Police, should cause concern.
Moreover, the news that the Met applied for a “public interest immunity certificate”,
to stop Leveson considering the case of a very senior officer in the force, is
worrying. What is yet worse is that this officer was close to then Commissioner
Ian Blair, and apparently passed information to the now defunct Murdoch Screws in exchange for money. And the
force stopped Leveson from considering the case.
The thought then occurs that not only do we not get to know
who this is, but also that we also don’t find out how much money changed hands,
the identities of the Screws hacks
involved, and who else in Rupe’s empire might have had their fingers in this
singularly unsavoury pie. Did, for instance, this affair have any bearing on
Murdoch’s decision to close the Screws?
Meanwhile, Labour MP Tom Watson has ensured that he
continues to be persona non grata with Rupe and his troops by noting “I’m sure the current Commissioner would wish
to urgently review what happened and I will be writing to the Home Secretary
Theresa May to ask that she satisfies herself that all seemingly vital
documents from the Yard were not withheld from Lord Justice Leveson”.
He might get further that way than the Standard did when contacting Leveson’s senior counsel Robert Jay,
who asserted that he and Leveson were not shown the information until well
after it could have been useful to the Inquiry, adding “The Met is claiming public interest immunity in relation to any police
intelligence report, the contents of which are neither confirmed nor denied”.
So where are the usual Leveson bashing suspects right now?
As has been pointed out to Zelo Street, Reading East MP Rob
Wilson, usually so eager to wind up Leveson, has thus far been silent. And so
have the usual suspects in the press. Why so coy? We’re talking about a senior
Police officer flogging stories to the Screws
here. This is about the basics of public trust – and very basic corruption.
As with the Daniel Morgan case – which was also about very
basic corruption, and abuse of public trust – the supposed champions of press
freedom seem unable, or unwilling, to report. Could this be because their view
of press freedom is the freedom not only to be highly selective in what they
tell their readers, but also because there is the possibility they have been
doing something similar?
Come on, press freedom campaigners, don’t be shy. We’re
listening. And waiting.
No comments:
Post a Comment