The so-called Taxpayers’ Alliance (TPA) has
convinced itself that thousands of pub closures can be attributed to the
level of beer duty. As I pointed
out yesterday, this argument fails to explain why supermarkets and
off-licence chains are doing a roaring trade in the stuff, despite having
to pay that same duty. It also fails to explain the use of pub sites as
property chips. I will explain.
This is the Cross Keys in Crewe. A large roadhouse pub at
the west end of Remer Street, it was trading as usual when the manager was told
it was to close. This was news to him: as far as he was concerned, it was a
going concern and not in any difficulties. But the pub was owned by a PubCo, they had been
made an offer for the site, this was accepted, so out he went and it closed.
The Cross Keys had the misfortune to be situated at the
corner of an area of land which had housing at the periphery, but a large
undeveloped space within. That undeveloped space had been purchased for new
housing. The developers needed a way of getting an access road into the site. So
they bought the Cross Keys: this gave them a way in. Stuff those pesky regulars.
Roadhouse pubs are particularly vulnerable to being picked
off in this way: they are by definition stand-alone buildings with a large
footprint, usually with a large car park (which makes the site yet more attractive
to developers), and so, unlike pubs that are part of a terrace or parade of
shops, there is little of that collateral damage when the wrecking ball fetches
up and the fun starts.
And the PubCos, being remote from the communities concerned,
don’t care about the site except inasmuch as it produces the best bang for
their buck. So you should not be surprised that the Cross Keys is not the only
roadhouse pub in Crewe to become a pawn in the chess game of redevelopment. There
was also The
Earl on Nantwich Road (note past tense).
The Earl was trading normally when the management discovered
that it was earmarked for redevelopment as a supermarket. As with the Cross
Keys, this was news to them (the regulars weren’t too taken with the idea,
either). The pub was duly closed, and after an interval when it stood there and
gently decomposed, the demolition teams moved in and converted it into a pile
of scrap bricks in short order.
PubCos also subject their managers to a tie system, so they
can’t sell what they want, being forced to buy from a set range at whatever
price is demanded. So Crewe’s only microbrewery Offbeat has no regular outlet
for its product in the town (except its own open evenings), despite being able
to sell everything it brews. Why does the TPA ignore PubCos? Simples. They’re potential donors to the
cause.
What Matthew Sinclair will not tell you. Because he’s a stinking hypocrite.
1 comment:
Sorry wrong blog!
From the headline thought this was going to be about Staines and Cole again. Still, another fine mess.
Post a Comment