Apocalyptic warnings rained down in advance of yesterday’s
debate on same-sex marriage in the Commons. Any deviation from the idea of
the traditional family was deemed abhorrent. Society itself was being taken
apart. You think I jest? These were, more or less, the exact sentiments
expressed by Melanie “not just Barking
but halfway to Upminster” Phillips as the vote approached.
“Why
failing to stand up for marriage is the reason Tories are always in crisis”
thundered the headline, as Mad Mel painted a picture of horror, should her
words be disregarded (as they usually are). It was part of “the attempt by the Left to undermine and
topple Western society”. There was an “intention
to destroy the unique importance of the married family and replace it by a
lifestyle free-for-all”.
Marriage, for Mel, is “the
safest way of generating human identity, which is necessarily produced by the
conjunction of male and female ... children's psychological health - despite
the heroic efforts of so many lone parents - generally depends on their being
brought up by both a mother and father ... it is socially so destructive to
promote the expansion of any sexual relationships outside marriage”.
How same-sex marriage expands sexual relationships of any
kind is an interesting one, and a revealing insight into the minds of those who
believe that what is written in the Bible (or Torah, or Qur’an) is not merely
absolute fact, but also, by implication, law – and that going against what may
have been the societal norms of thousands of years ago will somehow unleash
divine retribution on us all.
And so it came to pass in the Commons: MP after MP summoned
up the word of the Lord in support of their stance, mostly to excuse their
voting against same-sex marriage. There was yet more crashingly boring reference
to “Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve”
(managing to miss Adam and Eve not being married). But this was mere flailing
at the march of progress and tolerance.
When the vote came, the majority in favour of
same-sex marriage was a whopping 225, despite more than half the Tories who
voted going through the No lobby. Many who had previously entered civil
partnerships, or not registered their relationship formally, can now look
forward to being able to celebrate their big day and enjoy a status comparable
to being, well, just like ordinary married couples.
Yet there are still those in the right leaning press who
cannot get their brains round this: the
Maily Telegraph told that “Cameron has sown needless discord” and
asserted there was no popular pressure for the move. The
Mail took a similar line: “there is no public clamour for it”. And
it was all the BBC’s fault. The Sun wanted
readers to look over there at the Tory split (not at 54% of the public in
favour).
We have moved on, pundits. Tear down that wall of prejudice and embrace reality.
No comments:
Post a Comment