Still the @toryeducation Twitter feed rambles on, today
jumping on a study from the Institute of Education (IoE) in London as proof
that It Was All Labour’s Fault. Needless to say, things are not as cut and
dried as the people who are not Dominic Cummings and Henry de Zoete (honestly)
would like their audience to believe, not least because the IoE has said so.
So what’s in the IoE report? The headline, “Brightest English pupils fall
two years behind Far Eastern peers between ages 10 and 16” is where
@toryeducation is getting his cue. What the study has found is that, while the brightest pupils are doing almost as
well as those from the Far East at age 10, they are falling back by the time
they take their GCSEs.
The research also observes “The top 10 per cent of English children also appear to be losing ground to the most able pupils in other
English-speaking and European countries between the ages of 10 and 16”. That
is a less certain conclusion, and one look at the sources used for the study goes
some way to explaining this: there is a mix of other research used for
reference.
And, given that average scores for pupils between the ages
of 10 and 16 are “broadly comparable”
when looking at England versus the Far East, the blanket denunciation of Labour
by @toryeducation is shown to be misplaced. In some Far Eastern countries,
parents invest heavily in private tutoring and education is valued more highly.
No Government is preventing parents here from doing the same.
So England “could
perhaps do better for the top 10% of pupils” is the conclusion, and appropriate
recommendations are made. Clearly, that is not what “Oiky” Gove and his retinue of polecats want to hear, and neither is
a previous IoE headline, “No
hard evidence that England has slid down international performance tables, study
says”, from November 2011.
Moreover, that research was performed by John Jerrim,
co-author of the paper that the @toryeducation account is lauding today. His
past findings (see HERE
[.pdf]) include (also from late 2011) that “One
cannot firmly conclude that English secondary school children’s performance has
improved or declined relative to that of its international competitors over the
past decade”.
Dr Jerrim also observed “The
decline seen by England in the PISA international rankings is not, in my
opinion, statistically robust enough to base public policy upon”. As ever,
this is not a subject where there are quick and easy answers, and once again
one has to remind @toryeducation and his minders that they are playing with the
future wellbeing of rather a lot of pupils.
So perhaps they could
quit points scoring and messing around, just for once.
No comments:
Post a Comment