Having failed in their efforts to dislodge more bodies and
do more damage to the BBC, the right-leaning part of the Fourth Estate has
returned for another go. There is even an attempt at moral justification, too:
the Murdoch Sun claims
to want to see justice for all those abused youngsters. Sadly, the paper
never bothers to do any of its own investigating to try and get closure for
them.
The paper also tries to smear Labour MP Tom Watson, via
the loathsome Toby Young. Watson has emphasised that he did not say who was
in power, or the time frame, when there was a “senior aide” at 10 Downing Street involved in the abuse of children.
The Watson smear is repeated by the Mail’s
appallingly dishonest Quentin Letts (let’s not), wrongly
claiming that he identified “one of
... Thatcher’s friends”.
As with the rubbish
I observed yesterday from Bozza, Mad Mel and Kavanagh, this latest crop of
ranting vindictiveness devalues itself instantly by having to tell whoppers to
stand up its arguments and often takes a stance on other issues that shows it
to be, shall we say, not of the credible mainstream. This last is superbly
highlighted by a
piece on ConservativeHome by J-P Floru.
Floru, who is head of programmes at the Adam Smith
Institute, that museum of outdated economic thought that has fraudulently
appropriated the name of the founder of economics, starts from the premise that
the BBC supports the Labour Party and should be sold off. Then he sprays his
credibility up the wall by telling his readers that climate change isn’t
happening, and isn’t man made.
Also at ConHome, Bruce “Brute”
Anderson tries
what he pretends is a softer line on the Corporation, but ends up recycling
the old canard about reducing it to one TV channel and the kind of radio
programming that appeals to your average Tory lush. He, too, is working from
the false premise that the Beeb is biased, rather than the more obvious notion
that Tory supporters like him might
be.
Back at the Mail,
desperation means that the preposterously puffed-up Simon Heffer resorts
to a rhetorical question in the style of Fox News Channel (fair and
balanced my arse) as he thunders “Was the BBC’s blind hatred of Thatcher to
blame for Lord McAlpine smear”? He asserts that there is “an anti-Tory culture in certain parts of the
BBC” and talks of “institutional
leftism”, which means they don’t ask him on enough.
His colleague Max “Hitler”
Hastings takes
a more emollient tone, telling “The
BBC can be brilliant - despite its shambolic army of suits and bean-counters”,
but then, he gets to be a regular sofa-sitter on The Andy Marr Show (tm). Compare and contrast, as they say. And he
still joins the clamour for drastically slimming down (that means a lot of
cuts) the organisation. He too is about self-interest.
And the lot of them muster a pitiful level of honesty. No change there, then.
No comments:
Post a Comment