On the side of the Daily
Mail and its legendarily foul mouthed editor – as I noted
yesterday – over the hatchet job on those who have dared to advise Lord
Justice Leveson is the rabble at the Guido Fawkes blog. This is an alliance
borne out of fear of the unknown, as the perpetually thirsty Paul Staines is
frightened of anything that might impact on his nice little earner with the
Fourth Estate.
So it should surprise no-one that the Fawkes blog has
gone after the Media Standards Trust (MST) in its efforts to assist the
Dacre smear machine. The MST is held to be “Unaccountable
and Undemocratic” and it is concluded that those involved “really are enemies of a free press”,
although, as is usual for the Fawkes rabble, no credible evidence of how they
seek to make the press less free is forthcoming.
This leads us to one conclusion: any group that seeks to lobby
Parliamentarians must, in the eyes of The Great Guido, show where it gets its
financing, and moreover must elect its board of management, doing so in an open
and transparent manner. There must be no cliques, no self-selecting elite, no network
of pals, and no attempt to evade any inquiry about its activity.
But this display of high principles does not survive the
first encounter with the reality that is the Fawkes pals’ network, where
self-selection of the least transparent nature combines effortlessly with an
inability to tell where the money comes from. Take, for starters, the place
where Staines was drinking the evening he had an unfortunate encounter with the
Metropolitan Police while driving his wife’s car.
That was the Adam Smith Institute (ASI), the museum of
outdated economic thought that has fraudulently appropriated the name of the
founder of economics. Here, there is persistent lobbying of Parliamentarians,
while not letting on who pays the bills or how the management is selected. It
is the same at the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), and also at the
Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA).
And there is no more stark example of unaccountable and
undemocratic lobby groups than the so-called Taxpayers’ Alliance (TPA), another
outfit whose propensity for churning out selectively sourced propaganda is not
only notorious, but also much favoured by the Fawkes rabble. Whenever the TPA
issues one of its “reports”, based on
its apparent “research”, the Fawkes
blog obediently plugs the result.
The TPA consistently refuses to say who pays the bills, yet
it seeks openly to influence the print and broadcast media. One might conclude
that this influence is rather greater than the MST. So if The Great Guido wants
to demand accountability and democracy, he knows where to start. But there will
be no such demand, because Staines and his pals won’t dump on their drinking
buddies.
That’s because they’re all hot air and hypocrisy. Another fine mess, once again.
1 comment:
It's long overdue to have a register of lobby groups and compulsory declaration of funding sources.
Post a Comment