With Channel 4 News about to weigh in with victim and
witness accounts of the goings-on at care homes in North Wales, the head of
steam behind the move to look again at what happened all those years ago is
building. Home
Secretary Theresa May has appointed Keith Bristow, head of the National
Crime Agency, to conduct a “thorough
investigation” into the allegations.
At the same time, there will be an inquiry as to whether the
original investigation was properly carried out. It should be noted that this
is not the same thing as asking why it might not have discovered certain things
that are now coming to light: if its terms of reference were such that it was
constrained in certain matters, that doesn’t necessarily mean it wasn’t carried
out properly.
In fact, Richard Scorer, a solicitor who represented thirty
of the victims at the original inquiry, has said that its powers and terms of
reference were limited. Most importantly, Waterhouse only investigated abuse
within care homes. Why is that important? Because it’s alleged that much of
that abuse happened away from care homes, in places like the Wrexham Crest
Hotel.
That should be borne in mind when reading the denials from
those accused of being involved when they say that they never visited any of
the children’s homes. They didn’t need to. On numerous occasions, young boys
were collected from the homes by abusers, or intermediaries on behalf of those
who would do the abusing, returning them after the criminal acts had taken
place.
And how many names are we talking about? The Waterhouse
Inquiry identified 28 alleged child abusers, but banned their identification. As
the Telegraph has noted, this
included “a senior Conservative from the
Thatcher era who allegedly abused one victim in a hotel room alongside eight
other paedophiles”. This
is believed to be the peer whose
role I discussed the other day.
One problem in verifying all of this is that the Wrexham
Crest is unlikely to have retained its records from so far back, and of course
it’s changed hands since the period when the abuse took place. Whether local
hospitals kept records – some of the victims had been violently abused in
sadistic attacks by another of the accused – is another matter. Several young
men were supposedly admitted to Casualty.
Meanwhile, the last word has to go to Tom Watson: “The lesson of Hillsborough and hacking is
that a narrow-down investigation is the basic building block of a cover-up. To
limit this inquiry to north Wales and Savile would in my view be a dereliction
of the home secretary's duty. It would guarantee that many sickening crimes
will remain uninvestigated and some of the most despicable paedophiles will
remain protected by the establishment that has shielded them for 30 years”.
Indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment