In the wake of Alistair McAlpine’s decision to take legal action against
the BBC and ITV, plus an apparently open ended number of Twitter users, over
the erroneous association of his name with the North Wales child abuse scandal,
the punditry has seized on one thing, and one alone: Twitter is The One Wot Did
It. This alone is held to be responsible for all that is bad about social
media.
Still neither fair nor balanced
And no pundit is more sure of their ground on this one than
Melanie “not just Barking but halfway to
Upminster” Phillips, who has asserted that the McAlpine action is “A
watershed moment as the sadistic mob who rampage across the web are finally
taught a lesson”. Yes, “Twitter
and the net have become weapons of mass intimidation”, she continues. How
so?
“With single Tweets
sometimes reaching thousands or even tens of thousands of people, someone’s
character can be falsely assassinated and their reputation shredded across the
world in a matter of seconds ... Such fabrications, fantasies and
falsehoods take on a life of their own and can come to represent a
settled view which, despite being without any foundation whatever, starts
to supplant reality”.
Tens of thousands of people? That, to quote London’s
occasional Mayor Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson, is mere “chicken feed”. There are web platforms
out there that can reach not just tens of thousands, but millions of readers.
And one of those is the online version of the Daily Mail. Yes, Mel, that would be the same paper which is
carrying your rants, two of the most memorable of which appeared last year.
More specifically, these were published during the Labour
Party conference that year after a 16 year old called Rory Weal spoke to the
gathering about the suddenly reduced circumstances in which his mother and her
children had found themselves after his father had gone bust and his parents
separated. He eloquently spoke in favour of the welfare safety net and against
its erosion.
For this heinous crime, Rory Weal found himself on the
receiving end of, yes, a sadistic mob, one which published story after story of
smears, abuse and whatever other character assassination could be dredged up.
And, after the first wave of abuse came the following day’s gloating, which was
equally sadistic. You can see my observations of the Weal affair HERE
and HERE.
And one pundit was involved in both days’ attacks, the copy
being among the most sadistic, hateful and gloating: no prizes for guessing
that the name in the frame is Mad Mel herself. The difference between her and
the average Twitter user is that her ranting reaches millions of readers, and
is given the gloss of credibility because it’s carried by a national newspaper.
That’s the crucial difference.
Otherwise, it’s just more Melanie Phillips hypocrisy. No change there, then.
No comments:
Post a Comment