In the wake of the Paris attacks, it should be obvious that what ISIS, or whatever they’re called this week, want from the west is a knee-jerk reaction, a retaliation to show that their narrative - that this is a war between the two parties - is true, and above all a retaliation to act as yet another recruiting sergeant. For this reason, some commentators have called for cool heads and calm minds to prevail. But only some of them.
He's desperate, Dan
Over at the Telegraph, though, no such nicety is allowed to intrude into the increasingly confused world of their not all all celebrated blues artiste Whinging Dan Hodges, who has taken the opportunity of the mass killings in the French capital to once again tell his dwindling band of readers that this means Jeremy Corbyn is even less fit to lead the Labour Party than Mil The Younger, which means really, really rubbish.
And it’s not as if we weren’t warned: “Today was not the day to discuss the politics of what happened in Paris. But … Anyone who fancies tweeting me ‘stop using Paris to attack Corbyn’ over the next couple of days - seriously, save your breath”. Obsession knows no bounds, eh? And it gets worse: “‘France, we stand in solidarity with you’. ‘Will you join us is attacking Isis in Syria?’. ‘Er...no. Sorry’”. Never heard of Vietnam, Dan?
You know, Vietnam, the conflict where we supported the USA but didn’t take part, the finesse being executed by Harold Wilson. The bloke who won more elections that your beloved Tone. But do go on. “It is currently official Labour policy to say to surviving members of ISIS Paris cell ‘guys, if you can make it to Syria, you're safe’”. Leave the dishonesty to others, Dan. They make it look less obvious.
“Just so I'm clear, given we've decided not to join France in Syrian air strikes, we're safe here in the UK. That's how it works, right?” Spain withdrew from the Iraq adventure after the March 11 2004 Madrid bombings. Tell us how many more such bombings Spain has suffered, Dan. “The reality is, if we had the political will we could militarily crush ISIS in 12 months”. It’ll all be over by Christmas, won’t it? And it gets yet worse.
“Even by the standards of the Corbyn cultists, their ‘Jihadi Jez’ outrage is beyond parody”. Yes, likening someone seeking peace to a jihadist is, like, so just fun, isn’t it? And then comes the inevitable “look over there” moment: “Corbyn wants a political settlement in wake of Paris. Can someone explain what political settlement we are supposed to reach with ISIS”. He was discussing Syria. Syria and ISIS are not the same thing.
“There is no solution to the ISIS threat that does not include killing most of them … Even if the civil war in Syria stopped in an hour, ISIS will still have to be defeated militarily”. We’ve had a “war on terror” for more than a decade. We’ve pumped tonnes and tonnes of bombs into ISIS territory. We’ve killed hundreds, if not thousands, of their fighters. It hasn’t worked. As Corbyn keeps saying, ultimately there has to be a political solution.
[UPDATE 1835 hours: as if to demonstrate that Hodges has once again called it wrong, Jim Waterson of BuzzFeed has told that Sky News ("first for breaking wind") has now, after a near-50,000 signature petition, taken down its story alleging that an "anonymous Labour source" had referred to Jeremy Corbyn as "Jihadi Jez".
What you will not hear from Desperate Dan]
it is far easier for dodgy dan to spout this crap at the torygraph than for him to explain how to cut off ISISs funding. as that would involve explaining just how the banking system< of which the torygraph is such a vital cheerleader, uses its offshore bases not just to make sure that Osbornes family pay next to no tax in the uk but also to facilitate the movement of large amounts of very suspicious funds, around the Globe.
dry up the funds -no ISIS
do it by criminalising the bankers who facilitate it - more tax revenue in the UK
far too logical for dodgy Dan and his HSBC gang at the Telegraph
Just a thought:
Was Dopey Dan one of those who once jeered of talked[French] "cheese-eating surrender monkeys"?
I bet he won't do much of that now.........
The fellow is a tenth rate corrupt propaganda clerk paid to spread lies and poison. Which he does. Like all his type, he has neither principle nor honesty.
Back straight and steely eyed, Dan says we should fight ISIS to the last drop of someone else's blood. Like to lead from the front, Dan?
i think the really surprising thing about the likes of him is that people employ them. There are enough others out there who could turn in coherent clap-trap.
In an earlier era the Tel wouldn't even have had him as a tea-boy.
I can't really picture him surveying a battlefield.
As a liberal, I am not given to agreeing with Owen Jones, but it's difficult to dispute that he has a better argument than Desperate Dan here:
Poor old Dan. Kecks firmly around ankles.
Not surprising, really. The Telegraph wants someone of "Teh Left" (sic) so it can pretend it's a newspaper with a plurality of views - when in reality they get in a useful idiot who'll do the bidding of the two creepy tax-dodging feudalists hiding on their Bond villain-style island.
Post a Comment