Despite the
very rapid unravelling of Anthony Watts’ attempt to head the media pack off
and stop them taking notice of the latest news from the Berkeley Earth Surface
Temperature (BEST) project, the climate change denial lobby has today come
bouncing back with another “report”
by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) which as the name suggests is
there to rubbish Global Warming.
And this is no ordinary “report”:
as the title page of “The
Effect Of Wind Power On Household Energy Bills” points out, this is
being submitted as evidence to the Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee.
The numbers are suitably scary, too, with a figure of £124 billion being
pitched. And then the name of the author, Gordon Hughes, starts to ring a bell.
Hughes and the GWPF have come together before, and not
just once, but
twice. Moreover, there is very little that’s in the newest “report” that wasn’t in both the previous
two, except that his assertion on costs for wind power has increased to the
current £124 billion from “only” £120
billion previously. So how reliable are his claims for asserting that wind
means more in energy bills?
Sadly, there appears to be little in the way of independent
corroboration for his claims, the “report”
tellingly saying “Source: Author’s
Calculations”. Didn’t Hughes have his research checked? Why didn’t he
subject it to the peer review process that so many of the denial lobby find
easy to talk about and run down, but embarrassingly difficult to do when it
comes to their own work?
As with anything coming out of the GWPF, we don’t get to
find out about that, and in any case, the usual suspects in the Fourth Estate
only want the easy headline, the part that fits in with their agenda. The Express even promoted the story to itsfront page lead, but then, since Richard “Dirty”
Desmond’s latest job cuts, anything that can be got for free is in with a
chance.
And the Mail also
told its readers what to believe, announcing “Energy bills to soar by over £300 a year because of obsession with wind power” before adding “report claims”. Nigel Lawson continues
to extract maximum value from taking the legendarily foul mouthed Paul Dacre to
lunch. But not even the normally agreeable Telegraph
has taken the bait this time.
After all, while Team GB continues to stack up the medals,
more bankers are in the mire, and Syria continues to disintegrate, what was
news once isn’t going to command attention once the hacks realise it’s on its
third outing, although it’s a rare occasion when it’s the Express that got the original and the Mail that did the lifting. It’s
usually the other way about.
Perhaps Lawson, Benny
Peiser and the rest of the GWPF could take the hint.
No comments:
Post a Comment