With the speed at which news is reported nowadays, the
potential for pundits to put their collected plates of meat right in it is
magnified: by the time the deadline has been met and the print edition is out
there, Supermac’s dreaded “events”
may have overtaken it. By Sod’s law, this tends to happen when the pundit makes
a bad call. Today we have two prime examples.
Steady on Nigella, we're only talking elevenses here
After the Sunday
People got
hold of photos showing obscenely rich former ad-man Charles Saatchi with
his hand on the throat of his wife (and Domestic Goddess (tm)) Nigella Lawson,
this had to be covered by every other paper, because, well, she’s a sleb. Then
every pundit had to have an opinion on what looked like an episode of domestic
violence, upmarket eatery or no.
Then, when Saatchi made
a supremely ill-advised statement to the Evening Standard, describing what happened at an outside table at
Scott’s of Mayfair as a “playful tiff”,
there had to be yet more reporting and punditry, although it should be a
statement of the bleeding obvious that there is no such thing as a “playful” grabbing of someone’s throat.
So the scene was set for our two prize chumps to have their
ninepence worth: first, at the bear pit that is Telegraph blogs, was Cristina Odone with “Leave
Nigella’s marriage alone: it’s the only way it will survive”. And, as
the man said, there’s more: “The tragedy
is, if there had been no photos ... the couple would have done what any married
couple does after a bad row: sorted things, their way”.
Really? Do go on: “rows
between spouses never elicit much interest; unless one or the other sports a
black eye the next day, no one makes a fuss”. Er, right. Keep digging: “The only way the Saatchi marriage stands a
chance is if everyone – including the Metropolitan Police – back off. Sadly, I
doubt this is possible”. Now don’t go away, folks, and remember that last
line.
Meanwhile, over at the Mail,
the tedious and unfunny Richard Littlejohn was
walking into an elephant trap of his own making: “Nigella Lawson has kissed and made up with her husband after their
‘playful tiff’ outside a Mayfair restaurant. No complaint has been made to the
police. So why on earth is the Met’s
domestic violence unit on the case? What a complete waste of time”.
Both these clueless numpties were then exposed as
Saatchi, of his own volition, attended
a Police station and accepted a caution for assault. This means he admitted
having carried one out. Some “waste of
time”, eh Dick? And, as for Ms Odone and her “if there had been no photos”, well, then, who knows how many more “playful tiffs” Ms Lawson would have been
subjected to?
And they both get paid for these appallingly bad calls. So no change there, then.
1 comment:
"The tragedy is, if there had been no photos, no hysterical tweets, the couple would have done what any married couple does after a bad row: sorted things, their way. They might have seen a counsellor, or gone off on a holiday together; or they might have sat down to watch the telly into the night, snacking on fried Mars bars, harmony restored without so much as a word."
...or Cristina, if Saatchi is willing to put his hands around his wife's throat in public view in a restaurant, then sorting things 'their way' might actually mean sorting things 'his way' with more serious violence behind closed doors.
Post a Comment