No matter how cautiously the words are phrased, and in spite
of a range of caveats, when a former minister mentions the subject of shale gas
live on the BBC, the hacks’ antennae twitch to attention and those words are
instantly spun. And the Beeb’s
own report hasn’t helped matters, as it has relayed the sentiments of Chris
Smith, who is now head of the Environment Agency.
What you will see
Smith, recently elevated to the Peerage, has given cautious
support to the extraction of gas from shale, but is by no means cheerleading:
shale gas would be “potentially very
beneficial for our energy needs ... it could
provide energy security ... it could
be affordable”. Moreover, he has stressed that the gas “has to be drawn out of the ground
effectively and safely”.
Smith has stressed that this “means worrying about the way in which the drilling takes places, it
means worrying about making sure the methane is captured rather than discharged
to the air and it means making sure that none of the contaminated water gets
into the ground water that sometimes can fill our water supplies”. He also
talks of this being monitored and regulated “very rigorously”.
He also stressed that gas is still a fossil fuel, and that “we have to develop carbon capture in the
storage to enable us to reduce the greenhouse gas impact that it will have”.
So if that’s a yes to fracking, it’s a very heavily qualified one. That degree
of caution only increases the duty on media outlets not to get carried away,
but the Beeb has dropped the baton on the first changeover.
Not the most fair and balanced headline
There it is in bold type: “Environment Agency head Lord
Smith supports fracking expansion”. That’s not what the man said. But
the example has been set, and the Maily
Telegraph, home to such thoughtful and balanced luminaries as Christopher
Booker and James “saviour of Western
civilisation” Delingpole, has
already amended the BBC original to simply “Environment Agency boss backs
fracking”.
Indeed, the Beeb’s report has
even been reported more or less verbatim by the so-called Global Warming
Policy Foundation (GWPF), a haven of climate change denialism, such is the
coincidence with its agenda. It has been left to Jim Pickard at the FT Westminster Blog to
sound a moderating note by pointing out “Environment Agency chair not
entirely sure on fracking”.
Pickard has it spot on. Chris Smith has made a less than
unequivocal statement, and as the FT blog points out, he will tell of wider
concerns in a speech later today. In the circumstances, the Beeb could, and
should, have applied a little more thought before coming out with that
headline, which has just been spun and churned by the usual suspects to make it
look like a green light for fracking.
Because ideologically partisan hackery is always with us. No change there, then.
No comments:
Post a Comment