While the red-top part of the Murdoch press is busy trying to pretend that it really cares about those its hacks demonise and otherwise monster to the point of there being a body count, the allegedly upmarket Sunday Times is today claiming that the BBC is about to see its licence fee scrapped. This is yet another story brought to us by political editor Tim Shipman. And Shippers has been shipping rather a lot of bull on this one.
“No 10 tells BBC licence fee will be scrapped … TV channels face axe in move to subscriptions” tells the headline, with the article claiming that the plan will “Force the BBC to sell off the vast majority of its 61 radio stations but safeguard Radio 3 and Radio 4 … Reduce the number of the Corporation’s national television channels from its current 10 … Scale back the BBC website … Invest more in the World Service”.
And then comes the first sign that someone, either Shipman or whoever briefed him, has not thought this through: “Ban BBC stars from cashing in with lucrative second jobs”. If the Beeb is going to be a subscription service - and therefore independent - then what hold does Government expect to exert upon it? Its stars could do what the heck they wanted.
Sounds like him ...
Worse is in store for Shippers when it comes to the all-too-clear identity of who fed him this shipment of bull. “A senior source said [that’s ‘senior Downing Street source’, remember, which means someone not unadjacent to chief polecat Dominic Cummings] ‘We are not bluffing on the licence fee. We are having a consultation and we will whack it’”. Oo-er!
But do go on. “It has to be a subscription model. They’ve got hundreds of radio stations [not according to the bloke you briefed, they haven’t - see above], they’ve got all these TV stations and a massive website [how massive is too massive?]. The whole thing needs massive pruning back”. Basically, folks, it’s pretty massive. And there is more.
... and shipped by him
“They should have a few TV stations, a couple of radio stations and a massively [!] curtailed online presence and put more money and effort into the World Service, which is part of its core job”. Micromanaging, much? If it talks like Cummings, it might just be Cummings. And guess what? “The attack on the BBC will be led by John Whittingdale … One source described Whittingdale’s instructions from No 10 as ‘Mission: attack’”. There are two further front page references to “A No 10 source”.
Now I hate to rain on Shipman’s parade, aided and abetted by someone whose ranting sounds rather like Polecat Dom, but there is a problem here. This Government, even if it lasts a full five years, cannot plan any further forward than December 2024. The BBC’s current settlement lasts until 2027. Is it being proposed that it bind its successor?
Worse, that ranting, which includes more on those stars who make money outside the Corporation, sounds less like coherent policy and more like the embittered wailings of someone who has an axe to grind. Whether that is Cummings, Whittingdale, Bozo The Clown, his partner Carrie Symonds or whoever is immaterial. It still ain’t policy
Once upon a time, the Sunday Times dealt in serious, heavyweight journalism. Now it is reduced to kite-flying for an unelected mouth artist in Downing Street. Sad, really.
APPEAL The Legalballs Fund: I made a mistake. Now I need to raise £16,500 to cover a legal bill. You can chip in to help me HERE - all help is gratefully received. Thanks for reading this far!
6 comments:
Tim's appeal seems to have stalled at what is only a third of what it needs to be.
The service he provides is fantastic and he doesn't need something like this hanging over him.
Let's dig deep, spread the word and Get Legalballs Done, before Putin and Cummings step in and make him an offer he can't refuse.
I know that being on the left I should be above this... and its very rude to talk ill of some ones looks,but the way Shipman writes and tweets I thought he'd be a lot younger, a typical "alt-reich culture warrior"; but no it turns out he's just a fat old bloke, who probably looked 40 when he was still at junior school, and is well past his prime. Were he not in the press, I'm sure he'd have been pensioned off by now. Shame the same employment rules don't apply to the press as it seems the older you get the closer they get to writing that perhaps mass sterilisation of undesirables, as defined by themselves, was not such a bad idea after all (although, lets be honest, most of the press think that even if they don't write it out in longhand very often).
I think the BBC licence fee is due for review in 2022 though - the BBC's 100th anniversary. Why do people keep comparing it to the loss-making Netflix too? And how can you make it subscription-only when it is delivered by free-to-air methods? How many people own TVs and set-top boxes that have no provision for CAM modules? What becomes of the so-called "Crown Jewels" programmes?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2019/08/20/all-the-reasons-why-netflix-is-doomed/
Wasn't it the Tories who cut funding for the World service, calling it BBC left wing propaganda or some such?
Don't know about raining on Shipman's parade - but I'd happily piss in his face if he could get his tongue out of Murdoch's arse.
I notice that Whittingdale (to his credit) has pointed out the major obstacle to making the BBC subscription - only.
Anyway, I thought we left the EU because we didn't want to be told what to do by people we didn't vote for?
Post a Comment