George Galloway
Sweeney cites the Romania of the immediate post-Ceausescu period, when he first encountered Galloway. He also mentions Saddam Hussain, whom Galloway addressed in January 1994, telling The Great Man “Sir, I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability, and I want you to know that we are with you, hatta al-nasr, hatta al-nasr, hatta al-Quds [until victory, until victory, until Jerusalem]”. But that was a long time ago.
So voters may give him a pass on that. What they may find more relevant is Galloway’s record as an MP, and especially his voting record, which is readily available on the They Work For You site. Here’s how he voted on Taxation and Employment.
“Voted against allowing employees to exchange some employment rights for shares in the company they work for” (4 absences out of 5 votes), “Voted against lower taxes on fuel for motor vehicles” (5 absences out of 6 votes), “Voted for a banker’s bonus tax” (7 absences out of 9), “Voted against higher taxes on plane tickets” (7 absences out of 8), “Voted for increasing the tax rate applied to income over £150,000” (8 absences out 10).
On a further twenty-one categories in other areas, Galloway did not vote at all. So how does this compare with Naz Shah, who succeeded him at Bradford West, and Tracy Brabin, who he is looking to succeed at Batley and Spen?
They Work For You records Ms Shah as not having voted in a total of 14 categories. That’s just half the total of 28 categories in which Galloway cast no vote. Ms Brabin is recorded as having not voted in just ONE category. And as They Work For You has noted that all those MPs, and former MPs, mentioned did not vote in one or more category of votes, it has to be assumed that there were occasions where they could have done so.
It must be stressed at this point that Galloway’s Parliamentary voting record does not mean that he was not a diligent and hardworking constituency MP. It is, however, a subject on which he should be willing to put prospective voters’ minds at rest.
It is also a subject where other candidates might be expected to discuss, or even challenge him. The workers he would represent, after all, would be paying, were he to win.
https://www.justgiving.com/crowdfunding/zelostreet9
6 comments:
I have no time for the itinerant self-promoting megaphone that is Galloway.
But even less for the screeching right wing male harridan that is Sweeney.
The faux socialist Galloway is little more than a carpetbagger. If one judges someone at least in part by the company they keep, Galloway is a pretty disgusting individual given he is prepared to share a platform with racists, bigots and xenophobes such as Nigel Farage, Aaron Banks and Steve Bannon.
A serious candidate for Colney Hatch.
Galloway could win, Labour won't because they have lost the Muslim block vote here on top of losing the working class. Galloway understands how Muslim society works and is taking full advantage, like he did in Bradford. Labour may regain this seat in the future but will need a local Muslim candidate focusing on the concerns of locals to do it. Until Labour understands this is how the world works in such places it's death spiral will continue. Owen Jone's visit was very revealing, and he couldn't or wouldn't see the obvious clearly shown before him, blinkered by his metrocentricity Galloway's voting record will have no traction even if revealed to the Batley voter, he is speaking their language at the moment.
Leadbeater isn't selling herself and her LGBTQ+ agenda to muslim community leaders. Labour are sunk here !
Ahh, Colney Hatch. Happy days. They are a difficult audience to put one over.
Post a Comment